From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6B501C433FF for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 08:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C7F221880 for ; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 08:42:51 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727232AbfHLImu (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 04:42:50 -0400 Received: from foss.arm.com ([217.140.110.172]:45220 "EHLO foss.arm.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727207AbfHLIms (ORCPT ); Mon, 12 Aug 2019 04:42:48 -0400 Received: from usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (unknown [10.121.207.14]) by usa-sjc-mx-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F2E8174E; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:42:48 -0700 (PDT) Received: from queper01-lin.cambridge.arm.com (queper01-lin.cambridge.arm.com [10.1.195.48]) by usa-sjc-imap-foss1.foss.arm.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1C7733F718; Mon, 12 Aug 2019 01:42:46 -0700 (PDT) From: Quentin Perret To: edubezval@gmail.com, rui.zhang@intel.com, javi.merino@kernel.org, viresh.kumar@linaro.org, amit.kachhap@gmail.com, rjw@rjwysocki.net, catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, daniel.lezcano@linaro.org Cc: dietmar.eggemann@arm.com, ionela.voinescu@arm.com, mka@chromium.org, linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, quentin.perret@arm.com Subject: [PATCH v7 2/4] PM / EM: Declare EM data types unconditionally Date: Mon, 12 Aug 2019 09:42:33 +0100 Message-Id: <20190812084235.21440-3-quentin.perret@arm.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.22.0 In-Reply-To: <20190812084235.21440-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> References: <20190812084235.21440-1-quentin.perret@arm.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The structs representing capacity states and performance domains of an Energy Model are currently only defined for CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL=y. That makes it hard for code outside PM_EM to manipulate those structures without a lot of ifdefery or stubbed accessors. So, move the declaration of the two structs outside of the CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL ifdef. The client code (e.g. EAS or thermal) always checks the return of em_cpu_get() before using it, so the exising code is still safe to use as-is. Reported-by: kbuild test robot Signed-off-by: Quentin Perret --- include/linux/energy_model.h | 3 +-- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/include/linux/energy_model.h b/include/linux/energy_model.h index 73f8c3cb9588..d249b88a4d5a 100644 --- a/include/linux/energy_model.h +++ b/include/linux/energy_model.h @@ -9,7 +9,6 @@ #include #include -#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL /** * em_cap_state - Capacity state of a performance domain * @frequency: The CPU frequency in KHz, for consistency with CPUFreq @@ -40,6 +39,7 @@ struct em_perf_domain { unsigned long cpus[0]; }; +#ifdef CONFIG_ENERGY_MODEL #define EM_CPU_MAX_POWER 0xFFFF struct em_data_callback { @@ -160,7 +160,6 @@ static inline int em_pd_nr_cap_states(struct em_perf_domain *pd) } #else -struct em_perf_domain {}; struct em_data_callback {}; #define EM_DATA_CB(_active_power_cb) { } -- 2.22.0