Re: [PATCH v3 0/3] mm: kmemleak: Use a memory pool for kmemleak object allocations

[Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>]

On Mon, 12 Aug 2019 17:06:39 +0100 Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@arm.com> wrote:

> Following the discussions on v2 of this patch(set) [1], this series
> takes slightly different approach:
> 
> - it implements its own simple memory pool that does not rely on the
>   slab allocator
> 
> - drops the early log buffer logic entirely since it can now allocate
>   metadata from the memory pool directly before kmemleak is fully
>   initialised
> 
> - CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_EARLY_LOG_SIZE option is renamed to
>   CONFIG_DEBUG_KMEMLEAK_MEM_POOL_SIZE
> 
> - moves the kmemleak_init() call earlier (mm_init())
> 
> - to avoid a separate memory pool for struct scan_area, it makes the
>   tool robust when such allocations fail as scan areas are rather an
>   optimisation
> 
> [1] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190727132334.9184-1-catalin.marinas@arm.com

Using the term "memory pool" is a little unfortunate, but better than
using "mempool"!

The changelog doesn't answer the very first question: why not use
mempools.  Please send along a paragraph which explains this decision.