From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, ak@linux.intel.com,
akpm@linux-foundation.org, bp@suse.de, catalin.marinas@arm.com,
davem@davemloft.net, hch@lst.de, kan.liang@intel.com,
mingo@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, riel@surriel.com,
will@kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 8/9] x86/fpu: correctly check for kthreads
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2019 14:39:10 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190814133910.GC51963@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190814130708.b4lu3d6enkga5p4h@linutronix.de>
On Wed, Aug 14, 2019 at 03:07:08PM +0200, Sebastian Andrzej Siewior wrote:
> On 2019-08-14 11:41:30 [+0100], Mark Rutland wrote:
> > Per commit:
> >
> > 0cecca9d03c964ab ("x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state")
> >
> > ... switch_fpu_state() is trying to distinguish user threads from
> > kthreads, such that kthreads consistently use init_pkru_value. It does
> > do by looking at current->mm.
> >
> > In general, a non-NULL current->mm doesn't imply that current is a
> > kthread, as kthreads can install an mm via use_mm(), and so it's
> > preferable to use is_kthread() to determine whether a thread is a
> > kthread.
>
> I think this was missed in commit.
> 8d3289f2fa1e0 ("x86/fpu: Don't use current->mm to check for a kthread")
Yup, though if it's a bug it's been a bug since commit:
0cecca9d03c964ab ("x86/fpu: Eager switch PKRU state")
... which I guess the fixes tag would have to mention.
>
> A kthread with use_mm() would load here non-existing FPU state.
>
> Acked-by: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Given the above, should I add the fixes tag (for 0cecca9d03c964ab)?
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-14 13:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-14 10:41 [PATCH 0/9] kthread detection cleanup Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 1/9] sched/core: add is_kthread() helper Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 11:26 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-14 11:32 ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-19 8:52 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-08-21 11:21 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched: treewide: use is_kthread() Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 11:27 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2019-08-14 12:39 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 13:35 ` Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 13:37 ` Valentin Schneider
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 3/9] kmemleak: correctly check for kthreads Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 16:39 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 4/9] arm/perf: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 5/9] arm64: correctly check for ktrheads Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 16:40 ` Catalin Marinas
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 6/9] sparc/perf: correctly check for kthreads Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 16:26 ` David Miller
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 7/9] x86/lbr: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 8/9] x86/fpu: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 13:07 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 13:39 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-08-14 14:55 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-08-14 10:41 ` [PATCH 9/9] samples/kretprobe: " Mark Rutland
2019-08-14 13:43 ` [PATCH 0/9] kthread detection cleanup Valentin Schneider
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190814133910.GC51963@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=catalin.marinas@arm.com \
--cc=davem@davemloft.net \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kan.liang@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=will@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®