From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
To: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Albert Ou <aou@eecs.berkeley.edu>,
linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org,
Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@sifive.com>,
Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@sifive.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Anup Patel <Anup.Patel@wdc.com>,
Andreas Schwab <schwab@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/3] RISC-V: Issue a local tlbflush if possible.
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 03:46:42 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190822014642.GA11922@lst.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190822004644.25829-2-atish.patra@wdc.com>
On Wed, Aug 21, 2019 at 05:46:42PM -0700, Atish Patra wrote:
> In RISC-V, tlb flush happens via SBI which is expensive. If the local
> cpu is the only cpu in cpumask, there is no need to invoke a SBI call.
>
> Just do a local flush and return.
>
> Signed-off-by: Atish Patra <atish.patra@wdc.com>
> ---
> arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c | 15 +++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c
> index df93b26f1b9d..36430ee3bed9 100644
> --- a/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c
> +++ b/arch/riscv/mm/tlbflush.c
> @@ -2,6 +2,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/mm.h>
> #include <linux/smp.h>
> +#include <linux/sched.h>
> #include <asm/sbi.h>
>
> void flush_tlb_all(void)
> @@ -13,9 +14,23 @@ static void __sbi_tlb_flush_range(struct cpumask *cmask, unsigned long start,
> unsigned long size)
> {
> struct cpumask hmask;
> + unsigned int cpuid = get_cpu();
>
> + if (!cmask) {
> + riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cpu_online_mask, &hmask);
> + goto issue_sfence;
> + }
> +
> + if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpuid, cmask) && cpumask_weight(cmask) == 1) {
> + local_flush_tlb_all();
> + goto done;
> + }
I think a single core on a SMP kernel is a valid enough use case given
how litte distros still have UP kernels. So Maybe this shiuld rather be:
if (!cmask)
cmask = cpu_online_mask;
if (cpumask_test_cpu(cpuid, cmask) && cpumask_weight(cmask) == 1) {
local_flush_tlb_all();
} else {
riscv_cpuid_to_hartid_mask(cmask, &hmask);
sbi_remote_sfence_vma(hmask.bits, start, size);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-22 1:46 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-22 0:46 [PATCH v3 0/3] Optimize tlbflush path Atish Patra
2019-08-22 0:46 ` [PATCH v3 1/3] RISC-V: Issue a local tlbflush if possible Atish Patra
2019-08-22 1:46 ` Christoph Hellwig [this message]
2019-08-22 4:01 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-22 4:27 ` hch
2019-08-22 5:39 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-22 0:46 ` [PATCH v3 2/3] RISC-V: Issue a tlb page flush " Atish Patra
2019-08-22 1:50 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-22 4:02 ` Atish Patra
2019-08-22 0:46 ` [PATCH v3 3/3] RISC-V: Do not invoke SBI call if cpumask is empty Atish Patra
2019-08-22 1:51 ` Christoph Hellwig
2019-08-22 4:23 ` Atish Patra
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190822014642.GA11922@lst.de \
--to=hch@lst.de \
--cc=Anup.Patel@wdc.com \
--cc=aou@eecs.berkeley.edu \
--cc=atish.patra@wdc.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=palmer@sifive.com \
--cc=paul.walmsley@sifive.com \
--cc=schwab@linux-m68k.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome