mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
	Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Weiner <hannes@cmpxchg.org>,
	Suren Baghdasaryan <surenb@google.com>,
	Jason Xing <kerneljasonxing@linux.alibaba.com>,
	Caspar Zhang <caspar@linux.alibaba.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] psi: get poll_work to run when calling poll syscall next time
Date: Thu, 22 Aug 2019 15:21:07 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190822152107.adc0d4cd374fcc3eb8e148a9@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1566357985-97781-1-git-send-email-joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com>

On Wed, 21 Aug 2019 11:26:25 +0800 Joseph Qi <joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com> wrote:

> Only when calling the poll syscall the first time can user
> receive POLLPRI correctly. After that, user always fails to
> acquire the event signal.
> 
> Reproduce case:
> 1. Get the monitor code in Documentation/accounting/psi.txt
> 2. Run it, and wait for the event triggered.
> 3. Kill and restart the process.
> 
> The question is why we can end up with poll_scheduled = 1 but the work
> not running (which would reset it to 0). And the answer is because the
> scheduling side sees group->poll_kworker under RCU protection and then
> schedules it, but here we cancel the work and destroy the worker. The
> cancel needs to pair with resetting the poll_scheduled flag.

Should this be backported into -stable kernels?

  reply	other threads:[~2019-08-22 22:21 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-08-21  3:26 Joseph Qi
2019-08-22 22:21 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2019-08-22 23:11   ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-08-22 23:17     ` Andrew Morton
2019-08-22 23:21       ` Suren Baghdasaryan
2019-08-23  0:53   ` Joseph Qi
2019-08-24 20:51     ` Andrew Morton

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20190822152107.adc0d4cd374fcc3eb8e148a9@linux-foundation.org \
    --to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=caspar@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=hannes@cmpxchg.org \
    --cc=joseph.qi@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=kerneljasonxing@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mingo@redhat.com \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=surenb@google.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®