From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 06316C3A59F for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:45:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BA5E321848 for ; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:45:43 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1566848743; bh=7RD5XolL/SS4b+duqXLuyVNGAaFxlEUknxNCP2rhDfg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=rs1J23MGgOR0Ak2G4VewlDvqWNocTTOI9PsZObiEpVuUro35ARPh1d+p4ohibtPZv a7BD5tlpp/NEGuDtUytVdKC2NOHtSpsYwpJSgoWRpzXHj2WT04m0ncoTVq/w28zJDK w96P2Dq/XngfDVnJRBxbwUKtksZkv903QaXd+2K4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732351AbfHZTpm (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:45:42 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:37878 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728560AbfHZTpm (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 15:45:42 -0400 Received: from localhost (lfbn-ncy-1-174-150.w83-194.abo.wanadoo.fr [83.194.254.150]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46FD32070B; Mon, 26 Aug 2019 19:45:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1566848741; bh=7RD5XolL/SS4b+duqXLuyVNGAaFxlEUknxNCP2rhDfg=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=nG5B3s6F/L/TFvxmSOER1Qhv1UiZev0ARW+kJ1yUXhdfLVKPXxLRP2AiI35+baXFj h50uYV4gUkR2UVYNyzU2FpEkZf1NqmoQAEBpWy7kUrB6WyF2xkmPsgcvmqPLxPhWxi QtRtw64pBqTD2OQcSiFtEQKs/ZC7njNP0unkw3Ls= Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:45:39 +0200 From: Frederic Weisbecker To: Thomas Gleixner Cc: LKML , Oleg Nesterov , Ingo Molnar , Peter Zijlstra , John Stultz , Anna-Maria Behnsen , Christoph Hellwig Subject: Re: [patch V3 28/38] posix-cpu-timers: Restructure expiry array Message-ID: <20190826194538.GB14309@lenoir> References: <20190821190847.665673890@linutronix.de> <20190821192921.895254344@linutronix.de> <20190826163204.GA14309@lenoir> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.9.4 (2018-02-28) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Aug 26, 2019 at 08:22:24PM +0200, Thomas Gleixner wrote: > Now that the abused struct task_cputime is gone, it's more natural to > bundle the expiry cache and the list head of each clock into a struct and > have an array of those structs. > > Follow the hrtimer naming convention of 'bases' and rename the expiry cache > to 'nextevt' and adapt all usage sites. > > Generates also better code .text size shrinks by 80 bytes. > > Suggested-by: Ingo Molnar > Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner > --- > V2: New patch > V3: Address review feedback from Frederic Reviewed-by: Frederic Weisbecker