From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-10.1 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A236BC3A59F for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:38:41 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 75ABB2080C for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:38:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1566869921; bh=XAP+bFNfsfwa4XDcXB0WdP+rywPP34xU6eyFFIAkkdw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=le9g19wztZxCStJ2gNWWK95qyuT0ooebKOi7oylKY3tqW1jF+j+QFn2/lF7lr9JuS +i5zfv0049aWjq7ZbCPemw7gRc6FmEDOilxELljoatnJolY+hIHMy0MQWibyTLCdH6 0hrlvNzHlus/nYKOfaUKQ3pJ3KhfpG+QVu84NHbU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729175AbfH0Bh6 (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:37:58 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:51074 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1729094AbfH0Bhx (ORCPT ); Mon, 26 Aug 2019 21:37:53 -0400 Received: from quaco.ghostprotocols.net (unknown [179.97.35.50]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C535F22CF5; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 01:37:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1566869872; bh=XAP+bFNfsfwa4XDcXB0WdP+rywPP34xU6eyFFIAkkdw=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=p/rE6XCZUkxW+tewzh8GJuaxuZVcBK2XGIahclgj+0oAe+3IYyOMJAAL291SG2JxM ljracntKYWgpEFOLQY0hDjZurmLDkrJjJuDrlvgrr6Q2CFes2fU68YBa4xxa9kxXHw fW7dOkHWWXqIZDCAUYWy6UPqZaQ/CmR8KrRiUJJc= From: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo To: Ingo Molnar , Thomas Gleixner Cc: Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Clark Williams , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-perf-users@vger.kernel.org, Alexander Shishkin , Michael Petlan , Peter Zijlstra , Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Subject: [PATCH 23/33] libperf: Add PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES 'struct lost_samples_event' to perf/event.h Date: Mon, 26 Aug 2019 22:36:24 -0300 Message-Id: <20190827013634.3173-24-acme@kernel.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.21.0 In-Reply-To: <20190827013634.3173-1-acme@kernel.org> References: <20190827013634.3173-1-acme@kernel.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Jiri Olsa Move the PERF_RECORD_LOST_SAMPLES event definition into libperf's event.h header include. In order to keep libperf simple, we switch 'u64/u32/u16/u8' types used events to their generic '__u*' versions. Perf added 'u*' types mainly to ease up printing __u64 values as stated in the linux/types.h comment: /* * We define u64 as uint64_t for every architecture * so that we can print it with "%"PRIx64 without getting warnings. * * typedef __u64 u64; * typedef __s64 s64; */ Add and use new PRI_lu64 and PRI_lx64 macros for that. Use extra '_' to ease up the reading and differentiate them from standard PRI*64 macros. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa Cc: Alexander Shishkin Cc: Michael Petlan Cc: Namhyung Kim Cc: Peter Zijlstra Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190825181752.722-8-jolsa@kernel.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo --- tools/perf/lib/include/perf/event.h | 5 +++++ tools/perf/util/event.h | 5 ----- tools/perf/util/machine.c | 2 +- 3 files changed, 6 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-) diff --git a/tools/perf/lib/include/perf/event.h b/tools/perf/lib/include/perf/event.h index 71045ea8214c..86a779593405 100644 --- a/tools/perf/lib/include/perf/event.h +++ b/tools/perf/lib/include/perf/event.h @@ -56,4 +56,9 @@ struct lost_event { __u64 lost; }; +struct lost_samples_event { + struct perf_event_header header; + __u64 lost; +}; + #endif /* __LIBPERF_EVENT_H */ diff --git a/tools/perf/util/event.h b/tools/perf/util/event.h index 4a3f50203d04..976a8f00d2a2 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/event.h +++ b/tools/perf/util/event.h @@ -27,11 +27,6 @@ #define PRI_lx64 PRIx64 #endif -struct lost_samples_event { - struct perf_event_header header; - u64 lost; -}; - /* * PERF_FORMAT_ENABLED | PERF_FORMAT_RUNNING | PERF_FORMAT_ID */ diff --git a/tools/perf/util/machine.c b/tools/perf/util/machine.c index 1ad6e984c2f5..823aaf7b1b83 100644 --- a/tools/perf/util/machine.c +++ b/tools/perf/util/machine.c @@ -653,7 +653,7 @@ int machine__process_lost_event(struct machine *machine __maybe_unused, int machine__process_lost_samples_event(struct machine *machine __maybe_unused, union perf_event *event, struct perf_sample *sample) { - dump_printf(": id:%" PRIu64 ": lost samples :%" PRIu64 "\n", + dump_printf(": id:%" PRIu64 ": lost samples :%" PRI_lu64 "\n", sample->id, event->lost_samples.lost); return 0; } -- 2.21.0