From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AFB59C3A5A3 for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 13:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8CA9C206BF for ; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 13:22:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729876AbfH0NWF (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:22:05 -0400 Received: from Galois.linutronix.de ([193.142.43.55]:43665 "EHLO Galois.linutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726972AbfH0NWF (ORCPT ); Tue, 27 Aug 2019 09:22:05 -0400 Received: from bigeasy by Galois.linutronix.de with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1i2bQ9-0006Cr-2B; Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:22:01 +0200 Date: Tue, 27 Aug 2019 15:22:01 +0200 From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior To: Alexander Dahl , Julien Grall Cc: linux-rt-users@vger.kernel.org, Thomas Gleixner , LKML , Steven Rostedt Subject: Re: [ANNOUNCE] v5.2.10-rt5 Message-ID: <20190827132200.uj44quypjsqu3oup@linutronix.de> References: <20190827105542.qxvtteirkh55i5ly@linutronix.de> <1775495.KgcFvHdtex@ada> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1775495.KgcFvHdtex@ada> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20180716 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On 2019-08-27 14:34:19 [+0200], Alexander Dahl wrote: > Hello Sebastian, Hello Alexander, > This causes build errors on my side now, I tested with the .config we use on > our custom tree on a tag "v5.2.10-rt5-rebase", cross-compiling with gcc 7.3.1 > for ARCH=arm: of course, !SMP. What about this: diff --git a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c --- a/kernel/time/hrtimer.c +++ b/kernel/time/hrtimer.c @@ -934,7 +934,11 @@ void hrtimer_grab_expiry_lock(const struct hrtimer *timer) { struct hrtimer_clock_base *base = READ_ONCE(timer->base); +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP if (timer->is_soft && base != &migration_base) { +#else + if (timer->is_soft && base && base->cpu_base) { +#endif spin_lock(&base->cpu_base->softirq_expiry_lock); spin_unlock(&base->cpu_base->softirq_expiry_lock); } Sebastian