From: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.cz>
To: dsterba@suse.cz, Borislav Petkov <bp@suse.de>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>,
Pu Wen <puwen@hygon.cn>, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@amd.com>,
Linux List Kernel Mailing <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT pull] x86/urgent for 5.3-rc5
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2019 17:53:49 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190828155348.GD2752@twin.jikos.cz> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190828152040.GC2752@twin.jikos.cz>
On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 05:20:41PM +0200, David Sterba wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 27, 2019 at 07:39:55PM +0200, Borislav Petkov wrote:
> > @@ -42,5 +43,24 @@ void x86_init_rdrand(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c)
> > return;
> > }
> > }
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Stupid sanity-check whether RDRAND does *actually* generate
> > + * some at least random-looking data.
> > + */
> > + prev = tmp;
> > + for (i = 0; i < SANITY_CHECK_LOOPS; i++) {
> > + if (rdrand_long(&tmp)) {
> > + if (prev != tmp)
> > + changed++;
>
> You could do some sort of weak statistical test like
>
> if (popcnt(prev ^ tmp) < BITS_PER_LONG / 3)
> bad++;
>
> if (bad > TOO_BAD)
> WARN(...);
>
> this should catch same value, increments you mentioned and possibly
> other trivial classes of not-so-random values.
So the average popcount seems to be a more reliable check as I don't
have a good estimate for TOO_BAD. Ie. calculate average popcount and if
it's less than third of bit width, consider it broken. The script below
can be used to demonstrate the behaviour on a good random generator.
---
#!/usr/bin/python3
import random
popsum = 0
popcount = 0
prev = random.randrange(0, 2**64)
for i in range(16):
x = return random.randrange(0, 2**64)
pop = bin(x ^ prev).count("1")
popsum += pop
popcount += 1
print("PREV=%d X=%d popcnt=%d" % (prev, x, pop))
prev = x
print("Average popcnt: %d" % (1.0 * popsum / popcount))
---
PREV=8900625479737950182 X=12846979731852325434 popcnt=32
PREV=12846979731852325434 X=8887925161619955047 popcnt=35
PREV=8887925161619955047 X=988349339658261072 popcnt=36
PREV=988349339658261072 X=431141664953398919 popcnt=32
PREV=431141664953398919 X=13830962168734488538 popcnt=33
PREV=13830962168734488538 X=16591763919535693884 popcnt=33
PREV=16591763919535693884 X=7388685098481568010 popcnt=22
PREV=7388685098481568010 X=3526579832640281911 popcnt=33
PREV=3526579832640281911 X=2069567414175453497 popcnt=27
PREV=2069567414175453497 X=5562304115464083982 popcnt=28
PREV=5562304115464083982 X=14604545499285704604 popcnt=31
PREV=14604545499285704604 X=10602551277613833090 popcnt=31
PREV=10602551277613833090 X=6431137842853826307 popcnt=32
PREV=6431137842853826307 X=16231642336281616741 popcnt=41
PREV=16231642336281616741 X=520921733225029500 popcnt=38
PREV=520921733225029500 X=12014110422974389822 popcnt=21
Average popcnt: 31
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-08-28 15:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-08-25 9:43 [GIT pull] irq/urgent " Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-25 9:43 ` [GIT pull] sched/urgent " Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-25 17:40 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-08-25 9:43 ` [GIT pull] timers/urgent " Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-25 17:40 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-08-25 9:43 ` [GIT pull] perf/urgent " Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-25 17:40 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-08-25 9:43 ` [GIT pull] x86/urgent " Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-25 17:18 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-08-25 17:30 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-25 17:37 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-08-25 18:29 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-25 18:38 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-08-25 19:32 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-25 19:35 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-08-25 19:49 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-25 19:59 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-08-25 20:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-26 12:53 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-27 16:55 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-08-27 17:39 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-27 17:46 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-08-27 17:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-08-28 15:20 ` David Sterba
2019-08-28 15:53 ` David Sterba [this message]
2019-10-02 19:09 ` [tip: x86/cpu] x86/rdrand: Sanity-check RDRAND output tip-bot2 for Borislav Petkov
2019-08-25 17:40 ` [GIT pull] x86/urgent for 5.3-rc5 pr-tracker-bot
2019-08-25 17:40 ` [GIT pull] irq/urgent " pr-tracker-bot
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2019-08-18 11:34 [GIT pull] efi/urgent " Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-18 11:34 ` [GIT pull] x86/urgent " Thomas Gleixner
2019-08-18 16:55 ` pr-tracker-bot
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190828155348.GD2752@twin.jikos.cz \
--to=dsterba@suse.cz \
--cc=bp@suse.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=puwen@hygon.cn \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=thomas.lendacky@amd.com \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®