From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN,FREEMAIL_FROM, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,HK_RANDOM_FROM,INCLUDES_PATCH, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6EF4FC3A59F for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DB882341C for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 08:32:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="la2+M+eu" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727386AbfH2Icb (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 04:32:31 -0400 Received: from mail-pf1-f194.google.com ([209.85.210.194]:38973 "EHLO mail-pf1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727087AbfH2Ic2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 04:32:28 -0400 Received: by mail-pf1-f194.google.com with SMTP id y200so1571078pfb.6 for ; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:32:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references :mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k3M8uiAuXetNpwkP9uV7FXy08rtc6zGtFBjvOrw/zz4=; b=la2+M+eun68Ai5V5l+dVPftM47EwLer5oHtEAKclYQjMQNF10DVS+dOoYWhQy1OsIj +QSWj1o+V+Mhb9Q0VR2lHC7T81gk8ivVxWMKHD2d8RiMmMUPc01ceQQkWTEoPY6GWcmu 6RUIb7y0XKExGImC/zdAxr4758JSWyDocwAZqNLa8l76d2lfho438ryi4rxR4wdFg/d1 AhjwqLEjhlGpnGOfHHfy4d5tpGmgzvwoItdtlZYs5MoGc8zCsSqmnjAmr6VBrFOP0Hu5 Oz4kSDqSxib/RwKKbneU5PPpjQfs+BKHhbOFcTvWwzoijlxg3aTerFOgGhNTn3/rpil5 xBxQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=k3M8uiAuXetNpwkP9uV7FXy08rtc6zGtFBjvOrw/zz4=; b=d1zj4f55bnue5LSvXGFzau2p3rlkPt9FfID47YmWSdvuCyCk/S3Rt8yzk2cKMGRrUW uTzAHzaW2vYVE/eQnZQcIeMBT7NFF4rXL6176BV21kdRLqJcjwcoShJNzx8zZS0vk0yh d7qpHocG4LM2kTVX8Bfv1k3l5ggVtPGxjm5Nt8s6slAklowzqRq3WMJxOyIvg9iimf2q n/t0iO0xf8R++2RcGVLyWSop/1yGbXyfPIleHRcxPHphhkLQeNypC4GTPIYQFaZ2Sqbw w3U9Cm4FFkfr/fxP0ZR8he6aqb+rb6AolZkx2c4xz2uLKN5f6TJdyAdfcscBBF1BLM+B T+Dw== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAUCq6RCuFtRQhSg8dN2nwYk1TN9tgKE/ClcfL6k47PCcGo6rocS Eqs2x3ConBE5lL6/qXN6VcY= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwOW2TBF97D5oKrX/ivHtQx0UM+j+WhcIJ2/fylzH124O93U13aZMmr/416+9a23i2/+leHoA== X-Received: by 2002:aa7:8a0a:: with SMTP id m10mr10131373pfa.100.1567067548109; Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:32:28 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([203.100.54.194]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id v22sm1260155pgk.69.2019.08.29.01.32.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 29 Aug 2019 01:32:27 -0700 (PDT) From: Yuyang Du To: peterz@infradead.org, will.deacon@arm.com, mingo@kernel.org Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, ming.lei@redhat.com, frederic@kernel.org, tglx@linutronix.de, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, longman@redhat.com, paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com, boqun.feng@gmail.com, Yuyang Du Subject: [PATCH v4 11/30] locking/lockdep: Remove irq-safe to irq-unsafe read check Date: Thu, 29 Aug 2019 16:31:13 +0800 Message-Id: <20190829083132.22394-12-duyuyang@gmail.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.20.1 (Apple Git-117) In-Reply-To: <20190829083132.22394-1-duyuyang@gmail.com> References: <20190829083132.22394-1-duyuyang@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We have a lockdep warning: ======================================================== WARNING: possible irq lock inversion dependency detected 5.1.0-rc7+ #141 Not tainted -------------------------------------------------------- kworker/8:2/328 just changed the state of lock: 0000000007f1a95b (&(&host->lock)->rlock){-...}, at: ata_bmdma_interrupt+0x27/0x1c0 [libata] but this lock took another, HARDIRQ-READ-unsafe lock in the past: (&trig->leddev_list_lock){.+.?} and interrupts could create inverse lock ordering between them. other info that might help us debug this: Possible interrupt unsafe locking scenario: CPU0 CPU1 ---- ---- lock(&trig->leddev_list_lock); local_irq_disable(); lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock); lock(&trig->leddev_list_lock); lock(&(&host->lock)->rlock); *** DEADLOCK *** This splat is a false positive, which is enabled by the addition of recursive read locks in the graph. Specifically, trig->leddev_list_lock is a rwlock_t type, which was not in the graph before recursive read lock support was added in lockdep. This false positve is caused by a "false-positive" check in IRQ usage check. In mark_lock_irq(), the following checks are currently performed: ---------------------------------- | -> | unsafe | read unsafe | |----------------------------------| | safe | F B | F* B* | |----------------------------------| | read safe | F* B* | - | ---------------------------------- Where: F: check_usage_forwards B: check_usage_backwards *: check enabled by STRICT_READ_CHECKS But actually the safe -> unsafe read dependency does not create a deadlock scenario. Fix this by simply removing those two checks, and since safe read -> unsafe is indeed a problem, these checks are not actually strict per se, so remove the macro STRICT_READ_CHECKS, and we have the following checks: ---------------------------------- | -> | unsafe | read unsafe | |----------------------------------| | safe | F B | - | |----------------------------------| | read safe | F B | - | ---------------------------------- Signed-off-by: Yuyang Du --- kernel/locking/lockdep.c | 6 ++---- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c index acbd538..1dda9de 100644 --- a/kernel/locking/lockdep.c +++ b/kernel/locking/lockdep.c @@ -3221,8 +3221,6 @@ static int SOFTIRQ_verbose(struct lock_class *class) return 0; } -#define STRICT_READ_CHECKS 1 - static int (*state_verbose_f[])(struct lock_class *class) = { #define LOCKDEP_STATE(__STATE) \ __STATE##_verbose, @@ -3268,7 +3266,7 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *, * Validate that the lock dependencies don't have conflicting usage * states. */ - if ((!read || STRICT_READ_CHECKS) && + if ((!read || !dir) && !usage(curr, this, excl_bit, state_name(new_bit & ~LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) return 0; @@ -3279,7 +3277,7 @@ typedef int (*check_usage_f)(struct task_struct *, struct held_lock *, if (!valid_state(curr, this, new_bit, excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK)) return 0; - if (STRICT_READ_CHECKS && + if (dir && !usage(curr, this, excl_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK, state_name(new_bit + LOCK_USAGE_READ_MASK))) return 0; -- 1.8.3.1