From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5EAD5C3A59F for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2811E2343A for ; Sat, 31 Aug 2019 06:53:44 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726516AbfHaGxn (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Aug 2019 02:53:43 -0400 Received: from shards.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.9]:47488 "EHLO shards.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726086AbfHaGxn (ORCPT ); Sat, 31 Aug 2019 02:53:43 -0400 Received: from localhost (unknown [IPv6:2601:601:9f80:35cd::d71]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) (Authenticated sender: davem-davemloft) by shards.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BF53B15520975; Fri, 30 Aug 2019 23:53:39 -0700 (PDT) Date: Fri, 30 Aug 2019 23:53:37 -0700 (PDT) Message-Id: <20190830.235337.570776316111294728.davem@davemloft.net> To: linyunsheng@huawei.com Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org, ralf@linux-mips.org, paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, chenhc@lemote.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, cai@lca.pw, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, len.brown@intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk, dledford@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, nfont@linux.vnet.ibm.com, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, tbogendoerfer@suse.de, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, linuxarm@huawei.com Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 7/9] sparc64: numa: check the node id consistently for sparc64 From: David Miller In-Reply-To: <1567231103-13237-8-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> References: <1567231103-13237-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <1567231103-13237-8-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> X-Mailer: Mew version 6.8 on Emacs 26.1 Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: Text/Plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.5.12 (shards.monkeyblade.net [149.20.54.216]); Fri, 30 Aug 2019 23:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org From: Yunsheng Lin Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2019 13:58:21 +0800 > According to Section 6.2.14 from ACPI spec 6.3 [1], the setting > of proximity domain is optional, as below: What in the world does the ACPI spec have to do with sparc64 NUMA node ID checking?