From: Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>
To: Kelsey Skunberg <skunberg.kelsey@gmail.com>
Cc: bhelgaas@google.com, linux-pci@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org,
skhan@linuxfoundation.org, rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com,
keith.busch@intel.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Unify pci_dev_is_disconnected() and pci_dev_is_inaccessible()
Date: Wed, 4 Sep 2019 07:35:23 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190904053523.7lmuoo5zempxtsdq@wunner.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20190904043633.65026-3-skunberg.kelsey@gmail.com>
On Tue, Sep 03, 2019 at 10:36:35PM -0600, Kelsey Skunberg wrote:
> Change pci_dev_is_disconnected() call inside pci_dev_is_inaccessible() to:
>
> pdev->error_state == pci_channel_io_perm_failure
>
> Change remaining pci_dev_is_disconnected() calls to
> pci_dev_is_inaccessible() calls.
I don't think that's a good idea because it introduces a config space read
(for the vendor ID) in places where we don't want that. E.g., after the
check of pdev->error_state, a regular config space read may take place and
if that returns all ones, we may already be able to determine that the
device is inaccessible, obviating the need for a vendor ID check.
Config space reads aren't for free.
Thanks,
Lukas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-04 5:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-04 4:36 [PATCH 0/2] PCI: Change to using pci_dev_is_inaccessible() Kelsey Skunberg
2019-09-04 4:36 ` [PATCH 1/2] PCI: Change pci_device_is_present() to pci_dev_is_inaccessible() Kelsey Skunberg
2019-09-04 4:36 ` [PATCH 2/2] PCI: Unify pci_dev_is_disconnected() and pci_dev_is_inaccessible() Kelsey Skunberg
2019-09-04 5:35 ` Lukas Wunner [this message]
2019-09-04 18:45 ` Bjorn Helgaas
2019-09-05 6:43 ` Kelsey Skunberg
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190904053523.7lmuoo5zempxtsdq@wunner.de \
--to=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel-mentees@lists.linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pci@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=skhan@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=skunberg.kelsey@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®