From: Daniel Thompson <daniel.thompson@linaro.org>
To: Jean-Jacques Hiblot <jjhiblot@ti.com>
Cc: Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
kernel list <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-arm-kernel <linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org>,
linux-omap@vger.kernel.org, tony@atomide.com, sre@kernel.org,
nekit1000@gmail.com, mpartap@gmx.net, merlijn@wizzup.org,
tomi.valkeinen@ti.com
Subject: Re: Status of led-backlight driver
Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2019 14:04:00 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190909130400.erccomveu2ongeks@holly.lan> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <e40fcd10-85ef-9e04-0960-210736075f1f@ti.com>
On Mon, Sep 09, 2019 at 01:46:39PM +0200, Jean-Jacques Hiblot wrote:
> Hi Daniel,
>
> On 09/09/2019 13:14, Daniel Thompson wrote:
> > On Sat, Sep 07, 2019 at 12:07:27PM +0200, Pavel Machek wrote:
> > > Hi!
> > >
> > > I don't see the LED-backlight driver in -next. Could it be pushed? It
> > > is one of last pieces to get working backlight on Motorola Droid 4...
> > Sorry, I dropped the ball on this and was therefore rather late
> > reviewing this patchset.
> >
> > Assuming I have read the code correctly I think there are some
> > problems with the max_brightness handling in the backlight code.
>
> Can you comment this? I'll be happy to fix the problem.
I did that before replying to the nudges. See:
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-leds/20190909095304.67ehnpg6gckwpno4@holly.lan/
> Reading the v4 again, I noticed that that I still had not removed the
> brightness scaling. Is that the problem ?
Yes (plus a couple of nits).
Daniel.
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-09 13:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-07 10:07 Pavel Machek
2019-09-09 11:14 ` Daniel Thompson
2019-09-09 11:46 ` Jean-Jacques Hiblot
2019-09-09 13:04 ` Daniel Thompson [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190909130400.erccomveu2ongeks@holly.lan \
--to=daniel.thompson@linaro.org \
--cc=jjhiblot@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-omap@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=merlijn@wizzup.org \
--cc=mpartap@gmx.net \
--cc=nekit1000@gmail.com \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=sre@kernel.org \
--cc=tomi.valkeinen@ti.com \
--cc=tony@atomide.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome