From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B0AAC4CEC9 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 15:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6CC8320830 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 15:25:49 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com header.i=@gmail.com header.b="vOYsGPAy" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726871AbfINPZs (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:25:48 -0400 Received: from mail-pg1-f193.google.com ([209.85.215.193]:44513 "EHLO mail-pg1-f193.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725920AbfINPZs (ORCPT ); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 11:25:48 -0400 Received: by mail-pg1-f193.google.com with SMTP id i18so16852753pgl.11 for ; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 08:25:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id:references:mime-version :content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=h+ybOgPBdbmgnuqXjRrYZvQSWICvx+jC8gaIu6wXEOA=; b=vOYsGPAyZpkVOY+nRiXzF96qBLgnTZ28L+QyZ4t5Q1tK2Old+HBi4/qPnWyAZ3vPMX 8oaBj4muk9qQGCj8nzyHnIMV4au+ieHO9lXEUdpgrqWk5GLkBzi9UEaHrrDRO2MkZAwV qkJI/2kMb8kL4ISkWfcaDcRM2wMytHsycvt7dzjj2ULlvKAPcBoKRsY/OhlVw5eSdYG6 KF5hgSFFJ2n9V2R3HiyzZwU8NZEAH+tUtasmjkGvmEtnfyyXYf3ckoPwA6ns2fzhEdrz 6Q9yQK5WGb76E4d3R3RdPbsgPXBfzJLopPTc5O25EulQpJOmO9rFWCQ6TnwWghBbRoDV CZ8g== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:sender:date:from:to:cc:subject:message-id :references:mime-version:content-disposition:in-reply-to:user-agent; bh=h+ybOgPBdbmgnuqXjRrYZvQSWICvx+jC8gaIu6wXEOA=; b=X5eEw/oLZmhsfNyWDWpumS/X6uThqH79LtgbzepviEvwQxGAxa1wQYSTbk1qWv6ALk TdMoPaEoGkpGFTZ8i2uv6J+UdShA26P4Y7HGCqo/i3J+waOoLD83CXAXV5ZoVSjkdc5R P1GBC/Qhz9cirCJNeWbdOwMUdxQA3eTk4YNJp/ix7xiKcj167XbyIW6OxjRBfg+nrAUT otrDy9gUS/vJqX0RKLD1EOnPuEFd1bAjJSVCJFz7/ptf7WGmT63sc9AdQrN6CX2cKQsV zFp1yinhs+7iq1JLmYUfEkr8POB8MSpMl5nKU+3hIxGtoppxZxXVkLOh5fpU8Q1MCUpQ pPCQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAXWt/NoQhfFTBYEKcoFLykWt/Iy9M0ZZRdGPMkir8S3eFUgen8/ 54VB1KEVON2FW3bY6iAjkqc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqymogWDolBNczo2kKGqCE0LvOI9iMDUyqNgRBjbZKJeFny0oVpcdX0aY8yvQrvFNUwH4BROGQ== X-Received: by 2002:a63:89c8:: with SMTP id v191mr349331pgd.395.1568474747250; Sat, 14 Sep 2019 08:25:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost ([2600:1700:e321:62f0:329c:23ff:fee3:9d7c]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a18sm26574996pgl.44.2019.09.14.08.25.45 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 14 Sep 2019 08:25:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 14 Sep 2019 08:25:44 -0700 From: Guenter Roeck To: Thierry Reding Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] ARM, arm64: Remove arm_pm_restart() Message-ID: <20190914152544.GA17499@roeck-us.net> References: <20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20170130110512.6943-1-thierry.reding@gmail.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.24 (2015-08-30) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Jan 30, 2017 at 12:05:06PM +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > From: Thierry Reding > > Hi everyone, > > This small series is preparatory work for a series that I'm working on > which attempts to establish a formal framework for system restart and > power off. > > Guenter has done a lot of good work in this area, but it never got > merged. I think this set is a valuable addition to the kernel because > it converts all odd providers to the established mechanism for restart. > > Since this is stretched across both 32-bit and 64-bit ARM, as well as > PSCI, and given the SoC/board level of functionality, I think it might > make sense to take this through the ARM SoC tree in order to simplify > the interdependencies. But it should also be possible to take patches > 1-4 via their respective trees this cycle and patches 5-6 through the > ARM and arm64 trees for the next cycle, if that's preferred. > We tried this twice now, and it seems to go nowhere. What does it take to get it applied ? Guenter > Thanks, > Thierry > > Guenter Roeck (6): > ARM: prima2: Register with kernel restart handler > ARM: xen: Register with kernel restart handler > drivers: firmware: psci: Register with kernel restart handler > ARM: Register with kernel restart handler > ARM64: Remove arm_pm_restart() > ARM: Remove arm_pm_restart() > > arch/arm/include/asm/system_misc.h | 1 - > arch/arm/kernel/reboot.c | 6 +----- > arch/arm/kernel/setup.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++-- > arch/arm/mach-prima2/rstc.c | 11 +++++++++-- > arch/arm/xen/enlighten.c | 13 +++++++++++-- > arch/arm64/include/asm/system_misc.h | 2 -- > arch/arm64/kernel/process.c | 7 +------ > drivers/firmware/psci.c | 11 +++++++++-- > 8 files changed, 49 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-) > > -- > 2.11.0