From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1DC89C4CECD for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:24:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DFF1E214D9 for ; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:24:41 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1568636682; bh=kEGjavWLM0vbDXJ8cxrYtukR2OaYgF4ldAp/Hbo44EA=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=F01fT6LNFcOV/4xGAE1KN0YOXWSdk/RIa/nMUaoFjXpcv6zSrJrzPNCBGxAj3OJe0 RRmPfoyXTg7iT4bFqDJ9kjmF8lI39+v4UfqpIsL8Ch758kIoOx4ap/oNfOSMRdxFIW DPddHdIiHZNVRhm3c6HGUaQRpZcW5caFhFw5pCR4= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1732518AbfIPMYl (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:24:41 -0400 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:41480 "EHLO mx1.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727783AbfIPMYk (ORCPT ); Mon, 16 Sep 2019 08:24:40 -0400 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx1.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2F895B643; Mon, 16 Sep 2019 12:24:37 +0000 (UTC) Date: Mon, 16 Sep 2019 14:23:59 +0200 From: Michal Hocko To: Yunsheng Lin Cc: catalin.marinas@arm.com, will@kernel.org, mingo@redhat.com, bp@alien8.de, rth@twiddle.net, ink@jurassic.park.msu.ru, mattst88@gmail.com, benh@kernel.crashing.org, paulus@samba.org, mpe@ellerman.id.au, heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com, gor@linux.ibm.com, borntraeger@de.ibm.com, ysato@users.sourceforge.jp, dalias@libc.org, davem@davemloft.net, ralf@linux-mips.org, paul.burton@mips.com, jhogan@kernel.org, jiaxun.yang@flygoat.com, chenhc@lemote.com, akpm@linux-foundation.org, rppt@linux.ibm.com, anshuman.khandual@arm.com, tglx@linutronix.de, cai@lca.pw, robin.murphy@arm.com, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, hpa@zytor.com, x86@kernel.org, dave.hansen@linux.intel.com, luto@kernel.org, peterz@infradead.org, len.brown@intel.com, axboe@kernel.dk, dledford@redhat.com, jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com, linux-alpha@vger.kernel.org, naveen.n.rao@linux.vnet.ibm.com, mwb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, linux-s390@vger.kernel.org, linux-sh@vger.kernel.org, sparclinux@vger.kernel.org, tbogendoerfer@suse.de, linux-mips@vger.kernel.org, rafael@kernel.org, gregkh@linuxfoundation.org Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] numa: make node_to_cpumask_map() NUMA_NO_NODE aware Message-ID: <20190916122359.GG10231@dhcp22.suse.cz> References: <1568535656-158979-1-git-send-email-linyunsheng@huawei.com> <20190916084328.GC10231@dhcp22.suse.cz> <8df06e27-ad21-bf14-dbd6-cc8f5a274ec2@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <8df06e27-ad21-bf14-dbd6-cc8f5a274ec2@huawei.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon 16-09-19 20:07:22, Yunsheng Lin wrote: [...] > >> @@ -861,9 +861,12 @@ void numa_remove_cpu(int cpu) > >> */ > >> const struct cpumask *cpumask_of_node(int node) > >> { > >> - if (node >= nr_node_ids) { > >> + if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE) > >> + return cpu_online_mask; > >> + > >> + if ((unsigned int)node >= nr_node_ids) { > >> printk(KERN_WARNING > >> - "cpumask_of_node(%d): node > nr_node_ids(%u)\n", > >> + "cpumask_of_node(%d): node >= nr_node_ids(%u)\n", > >> node, nr_node_ids); > >> dump_stack(); > >> return cpu_none_mask; > > > > Why do we need this? > > As the commit log says, the above cpumask_of_node() is for debugging, > it should catch other "node < 0" cases except NUMA_NO_NODE. OK, I would just make it a separate patch. -- Michal Hocko SUSE Labs