Re: [PATCH 2/3] nfp: Drop unnecessary continue in nfp_net_pf_alloc_vnics

[Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@netronome.com>]

On Wed, 4 Sep 2019 11:46:23 +0800, zhong jiang wrote:
> Continue is not needed at the bottom of a loop.
> 
> Signed-off-by: zhong jiang <zhongjiang@huawei.com>
> ---
>  drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c
> index 986464d..68db47d 100644
> --- a/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c
> +++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/netronome/nfp/nfp_net_main.c
> @@ -205,10 +205,8 @@ static void nfp_net_pf_free_vnics(struct nfp_pf *pf)
>  		ctrl_bar += NFP_PF_CSR_SLICE_SIZE;
>  
>  		/* Kill the vNIC if app init marked it as invalid */
> -		if (nn->port && nn->port->type == NFP_PORT_INVALID) {
> +		if (nn->port && nn->port->type == NFP_PORT_INVALID)
>  			nfp_net_pf_free_vnic(pf, nn);
> -			continue;
> -		}

Ugh, I already nack at least one patch like this, this continue makes
the _intent_ of the code more clear, the compiler will ignore it anyway.

I guess there's no use in fighting the bots..

>  	}
>  
>  	if (list_empty(&pf->vnics))