From: Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@arm.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@google.com>
Cc: kasan-dev <kasan-dev@googlegroups.com>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@google.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@google.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@google.com>,
paulmck@linux.ibm.com, Paul Turner <pjt@google.com>,
Daniel Axtens <dja@axtens.net>,
Anatol Pomazau <anatol@google.com>,
Will Deacon <willdeacon@google.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>,
stern@rowland.harvard.edu, akiyks@gmail.com, npiggin@gmail.com,
boqun.feng@gmail.com, dlustig@nvidia.com, j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk,
luc.maranget@inria.fr
Subject: Re: Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer (KCSAN)
Date: Fri, 20 Sep 2019 17:31:25 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20190920163123.GC55224@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANpmjNPJ_bHjfLZCAPV23AXFfiPiyXXqqu72n6TgWzb2Gnu1eA@mail.gmail.com>
On Fri, Sep 20, 2019 at 04:18:57PM +0200, Marco Elver wrote:
> Hi all,
Hi,
> We would like to share a new data-race detector for the Linux kernel:
> Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer (KCSAN) --
> https://github.com/google/ktsan/wiki/KCSAN (Details:
> https://github.com/google/ktsan/blob/kcsan/Documentation/dev-tools/kcsan.rst)
Nice!
BTW kcsan_atomic_next() is missing a stub definition in <linux/kcsan.h>
when !CONFIG_KCSAN:
https://github.com/google/ktsan/commit/a22a093a0f0d0b582c82cdbac4f133a3f61d207c#diff-19d7c475b4b92aab8ba440415ab786ec
... and I think the kcsan_{begin,end}_atomic() stubs need to be static
inline too.
It looks like this is easy enough to enable on arm64, with the only real
special case being secondary_start_kernel() which we might want to
refactor to allow some portions to be instrumented.
I pushed the trivial patches I needed to get arm64 booting to my arm64/kcsan
branch:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/mark/linux.git arm64/kcsan
We have some interesting splats at boot time in stop_machine, which
don't seem to have been hit/fixed on x86 yet in the kcsan-with-fixes
branch, e.g.
[ 0.237939] ==================================================================
[ 0.239431] BUG: KCSAN: data-race in multi_cpu_stop+0xa8/0x198 and set_state+0x80/0xb0
[ 0.241189]
[ 0.241606] write to 0xffff00001003bd00 of 4 bytes by task 24 on cpu 3:
[ 0.243435] set_state+0x80/0xb0
[ 0.244328] multi_cpu_stop+0x16c/0x198
[ 0.245406] cpu_stopper_thread+0x170/0x298
[ 0.246565] smpboot_thread_fn+0x40c/0x560
[ 0.247696] kthread+0x1a8/0x1b0
[ 0.248586] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[ 0.249589]
[ 0.250006] read to 0xffff00001003bd00 of 4 bytes by task 14 on cpu 1:
[ 0.251804] multi_cpu_stop+0xa8/0x198
[ 0.252851] cpu_stopper_thread+0x170/0x298
[ 0.254008] smpboot_thread_fn+0x40c/0x560
[ 0.255135] kthread+0x1a8/0x1b0
[ 0.256027] ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
[ 0.257036]
[ 0.257449] Reported by Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer on:
[ 0.258918] CPU: 1 PID: 14 Comm: migration/1 Not tainted 5.3.0-00007-g67ab35a199f4-dirty #3
[ 0.261241] Hardware name: linux,dummy-virt (DT)
[ 0.262517] ==================================================================
> To those of you who we mentioned at LPC that we're working on a
> watchpoint-based KTSAN inspired by DataCollider [1], this is it (we
> renamed it to KCSAN to avoid confusion with KTSAN).
> [1] http://usenix.org/legacy/events/osdi10/tech/full_papers/Erickson.pdf
>
> In the coming weeks we're planning to:
> * Set up a syzkaller instance.
> * Share the dashboard so that you can see the races that are found.
> * Attempt to send fixes for some races upstream (if you find that the
> kcsan-with-fixes branch contains an important fix, please feel free to
> point it out and we'll prioritize that).
>
> There are a few open questions:
> * The big one: most of the reported races are due to unmarked
> accesses; prioritization or pruning of races to focus initial efforts
> to fix races might be required. Comments on how best to proceed are
> welcome. We're aware that these are issues that have recently received
> attention in the context of the LKMM
> (https://lwn.net/Articles/793253/).
I think the big risk here is drive-by "fixes" masking the warnings
rather than fixing the actual issue. It's easy for people to suppress a
warning with {READ,WRITE}_ONCE(), so they're liable to do that even the
resulting race isn't benign.
I don't have a clue how to prevent that, though.
> * How/when to upstream KCSAN?
I would love to see this soon!
Thanks,
Mark.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-09-20 16:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 34+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-20 14:18 Marco Elver
2019-09-20 15:54 ` Will Deacon
2019-09-20 17:50 ` Marco Elver
2019-09-23 4:31 ` Boqun Feng
2019-09-23 8:21 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-09-23 8:54 ` Boqun Feng
2019-09-23 8:59 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-09-23 11:01 ` Marco Elver
2019-09-23 12:32 ` Boqun Feng
2019-10-05 0:58 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-10-05 4:16 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-09 7:45 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-09 16:39 ` Eric Dumazet
2019-10-09 20:17 ` Andrea Parri
2019-09-20 16:31 ` Mark Rutland [this message]
2019-09-20 16:46 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-09-20 17:51 ` Marco Elver
2019-10-03 16:12 ` Mark Rutland
2019-10-03 19:27 ` Marco Elver
2019-10-01 14:50 ` Daniel Axtens
2019-10-02 19:42 ` Marco Elver
2019-10-11 3:45 ` Daniel Axtens
2019-10-01 21:19 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-10-02 19:51 ` Marco Elver
2019-10-03 13:13 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-03 16:00 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-03 19:39 ` Christian Brauner
2019-10-04 16:48 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-10-04 16:52 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-04 16:57 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-10-04 17:01 ` Dmitry Vyukov
2019-10-04 18:08 ` Joel Fernandes
2019-10-04 18:28 ` Dmitry Vyukov
[not found] ` <CADyx2V6j+do+CmmSYEUr0iP7TUWD7xHLP2ZJPrqB1Y+QEAwzhw@mail.gmail.com>
2019-12-12 20:53 ` Marco Elver
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20190920163123.GC55224@lakrids.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=mark.rutland@arm.com \
--cc=akiyks@gmail.com \
--cc=anatol@google.com \
--cc=andreyknvl@google.com \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=dja@axtens.net \
--cc=dlustig@nvidia.com \
--cc=dvyukov@google.com \
--cc=elver@google.com \
--cc=glider@google.com \
--cc=j.alglave@ucl.ac.uk \
--cc=kasan-dev@googlegroups.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luc.maranget@inria.fr \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
--cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=pjt@google.com \
--cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
--cc=willdeacon@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®