From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8EC66C35280 for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 12:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6BC7B2133F for ; Wed, 2 Oct 2019 12:33:10 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726446AbfJBMdK (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 08:33:10 -0400 Received: from mga03.intel.com ([134.134.136.65]:27022 "EHLO mga03.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1725766AbfJBMdJ (ORCPT ); Wed, 2 Oct 2019 08:33:09 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from fmsmga001.fm.intel.com ([10.253.24.23]) by orsmga103.jf.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 02 Oct 2019 05:33:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.64,574,1559545200"; d="scan'208";a="205330025" Received: from black.fi.intel.com (HELO black.fi.intel.com.) ([10.237.72.28]) by fmsmga001.fm.intel.com with ESMTP; 02 Oct 2019 05:33:05 -0700 From: Heikki Krogerus To: Laurent Pinchart Cc: Dmitry Torokhov , Andy Shevchenko , "Rafael J. Wysocki" , Mika Westerberg , linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] software node: API documentation Date: Wed, 2 Oct 2019 15:33:03 +0300 Message-Id: <20191002123305.80012-1-heikki.krogerus@linux.intel.com> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Hi, I'm sending this as an RFC first. I would like to wait for the API change Dmitry proposed [1] before we add the final API documentation for the software nodes. At this point I would like to know if the generic use is explained clearly enough and if there is anything missing that should be added. [1] https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/9/11/8 thanks, Heikki Krogerus (2): software node: Add missing kernel-doc function descriptions software node: Add documentation Documentation/driver-api/software_node.rst | 197 +++++++++++++++++++++ drivers/base/swnode.c | 23 +++ 2 files changed, 220 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/driver-api/software_node.rst -- 2.23.0