From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 91D1FC10F14 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 710D220673 for ; Tue, 8 Oct 2019 11:36:17 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1730725AbfJHLgC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 07:36:02 -0400 Received: from imap1.codethink.co.uk ([176.9.8.82]:52415 "EHLO imap1.codethink.co.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1730393AbfJHLgC (ORCPT ); Tue, 8 Oct 2019 07:36:02 -0400 Received: from [167.98.27.226] (helo=rainbowdash.codethink.co.uk) by imap1.codethink.co.uk with esmtpsa (Exim 4.84_2 #1 (Debian)) id 1iHnma-0007Yt-I5; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:36:00 +0100 Received: from ben by rainbowdash.codethink.co.uk with local (Exim 4.92.2) (envelope-from ) id 1iHnma-0007hg-6Z; Tue, 08 Oct 2019 12:36:00 +0100 From: Ben Dooks To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, nouveau@lists.freedesktop.org, dri-devel@lists.freedesktop.org Cc: Ben Skeggs , David Airlie , Daniel Vetter , Ben Dooks Subject: [PATCH 1/5] drm/nouveau/gr/gf100-: make undeclared symbols static Date: Tue, 8 Oct 2019 12:35:55 +0100 Message-Id: <20191008113559.29569-1-ben.dooks@codethink.co.uk> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.23.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org The following functions are not declared outside of the file they are in, so make them static to avoid these warnings: drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c:745:1: warning: symbol 'gf100_gr_fecs_start_ctxsw' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c:760:1: warning: symbol 'gf100_gr_fecs_stop_ctxsw' was not declared. Should it be static? drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c:2071:1: warning: symbol 'gf100_gr_ctor_fw_legacy' was not declared. Should it be static? Signed-off-by: Ben Dooks --- drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c | 6 +++--- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c index c578deb5867a..f1d1174ce67a 100644 --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/gr/gf100.c @@ -741,7 +741,7 @@ gf100_gr_fecs_ctrl_ctxsw(struct gf100_gr *gr, u32 mthd) return -ETIMEDOUT; } -int +static int gf100_gr_fecs_start_ctxsw(struct nvkm_gr *base) { struct gf100_gr *gr = gf100_gr(base); @@ -756,7 +756,7 @@ gf100_gr_fecs_start_ctxsw(struct nvkm_gr *base) return ret; } -int +static int gf100_gr_fecs_stop_ctxsw(struct nvkm_gr *base) { struct gf100_gr *gr = gf100_gr(base); @@ -2067,7 +2067,7 @@ gf100_gr_ = { .ctxsw.inst = gf100_gr_ctxsw_inst, }; -int +static int gf100_gr_ctor_fw_legacy(struct gf100_gr *gr, const char *fwname, struct gf100_gr_fuc *fuc, int ret) { -- 2.23.0