From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-9.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,INCLUDES_PATCH,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SIGNED_OFF_BY,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_GIT autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1A80FC10F14 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:29:08 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EBA06214E0 for ; Fri, 11 Oct 2019 00:29:07 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linaro.org header.i=@linaro.org header.b="lgPdUOsd" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727924AbfJKA3H (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:29:07 -0400 Received: from mail-lf1-f68.google.com ([209.85.167.68]:42479 "EHLO mail-lf1-f68.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727695AbfJKA2g (ORCPT ); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 20:28:36 -0400 Received: by mail-lf1-f68.google.com with SMTP id c195so5709976lfg.9 for ; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:28:33 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to:references; bh=03GhUEVVPKzA4TMKrHg2hN3Csg5CX1o2irsu+gSocso=; b=lgPdUOsdWvm3NrU+k0qDkNxtB02GwhSc5KwzTrCweHYaxGN3NwSL194iDLlMKbHnkv HQsLrmFRtK/MtY3s/t6lnF+dn79c9z+krOQUQchJEDuQ1x5wj40QtHKQGOOzwMr6pRkZ m5Vkk9C5vFXa/NWObQzlISQO4YdbJs44MBjE2Xjous5QWHXDZlr5DcIOTBFHkyeEGG61 WF5Q7LTNZe3DrJVHzyS/VSxTW8rou+w2JR/RdhCDReKxj3Ac/8BRWjvZzNJle1gTsy0r gvhuogyNpORJ/IMHS8eJ+Y6UViz1GyjAt2gUp2tjQrsb1BfdiOFJaLYy7NLhBHyRChj0 y2Pw== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:in-reply-to :references; bh=03GhUEVVPKzA4TMKrHg2hN3Csg5CX1o2irsu+gSocso=; b=Z55REVOcbJQPNMFU+LI6jVZes/kxzgG8NZIAQHWhErPV7UfOFI67pHeTp1OL3Bqpmf i+DgiENvbwkky9USSM/xi8uLh+i/UFeAonKOEBf4tB8brB4Nyyi9a8OKqvoYr23IB91N rN8Jd1mblAhT9gVnilULh77RjfCy1BqkHh81sg0GIRrnZKYs2t3l54JFF+b7FrZ4dXo5 jRjzsSLMUjcouDiDDt7iANlJiGAC+zELC+p26HZ5EOH83zMlRLVG+3Rud52jDxXiBmdX gsdjatMlE4PmewtlwfA66qnKZTFjZqaujseWOO/9jGIiu0pPKjZUmvzVjx3HlFYKXs+z Gt1Q== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVEwQXQv1i5+2PNAN/kcR1Ntcvdyu4cTDPt70xw3zSuu/y0FAg9 Rx2p4A1sOw0BMLXnv82/9KnHzw== X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqy0DvtjgGiKI7+n5Ix8WqhnukzK5KufDqlv4+eYNhjK3Y4l+UKA9J1K50qMit1NFTou4C7DEA== X-Received: by 2002:ac2:43d9:: with SMTP id u25mr7678515lfl.142.1570753713044; Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:28:33 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost.localdomain (88-201-94-178.pool.ukrtel.net. [178.94.201.88]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 126sm2367010lfh.45.2019.10.10.17.28.31 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Thu, 10 Oct 2019 17:28:32 -0700 (PDT) From: Ivan Khoronzhuk To: ast@kernel.org, daniel@iogearbox.net, yhs@fb.com, davem@davemloft.net, jakub.kicinski@netronome.com, hawk@kernel.org, john.fastabend@gmail.com Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, netdev@vger.kernel.org, bpf@vger.kernel.org, clang-built-linux@googlegroups.com, ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, sergei.shtylyov@cogentembedded.com, Ivan Khoronzhuk Subject: [PATCH v5 bpf-next 09/15] samples/bpf: use own flags but not HOSTCFLAGS Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2019 03:28:02 +0300 Message-Id: <20191011002808.28206-10-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> X-Mailer: git-send-email 2.17.1 In-Reply-To: <20191011002808.28206-1-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> References: <20191011002808.28206-1-ivan.khoronzhuk@linaro.org> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org While compiling natively, the host's cflags and ldflags are equal to ones used from HOSTCFLAGS and HOSTLDFLAGS. When cross compiling it should have own, used for target arch. While verification, for arm, arm64 and x86_64 the following flags were used always: -Wall -O2 -fomit-frame-pointer -Wmissing-prototypes -Wstrict-prototypes So, add them as they were verified and used before adding Makefile.target and lets omit "-fomit-frame-pointer" as were proposed while review, as no sense in such optimization for samples. Signed-off-by: Ivan Khoronzhuk --- samples/bpf/Makefile | 6 ++++-- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/samples/bpf/Makefile b/samples/bpf/Makefile index 91bfb421c278..57a15ff938a6 100644 --- a/samples/bpf/Makefile +++ b/samples/bpf/Makefile @@ -176,8 +176,10 @@ BPF_EXTRA_CFLAGS := $(ARM_ARCH_SELECTOR) TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(ARM_ARCH_SELECTOR) endif -TPROGS_LDLIBS := $(KBUILD_HOSTLDLIBS) -TPROGS_CFLAGS += $(KBUILD_HOSTCFLAGS) $(HOST_EXTRACFLAGS) +TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wall -O2 +TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wmissing-prototypes +TPROGS_CFLAGS += -Wstrict-prototypes + TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(objtree)/usr/include TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/lib/bpf/ TPROGS_CFLAGS += -I$(srctree)/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/ -- 2.17.1