From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7B45BECE599 for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 22:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 533B3207FF for ; Wed, 16 Oct 2019 22:14:14 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2439339AbfJPWON (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:14:13 -0400 Received: from mga01.intel.com ([192.55.52.88]:64007 "EHLO mga01.intel.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2405224AbfJPWOK (ORCPT ); Wed, 16 Oct 2019 18:14:10 -0400 X-Amp-Result: SKIPPED(no attachment in message) X-Amp-File-Uploaded: False Received: from orsmga002.jf.intel.com ([10.7.209.21]) by fmsmga101.fm.intel.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384; 16 Oct 2019 15:14:09 -0700 X-ExtLoop1: 1 X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.67,305,1566889200"; d="scan'208";a="208057636" Received: from viggo.jf.intel.com (HELO localhost.localdomain) ([10.54.77.144]) by orsmga002.jf.intel.com with ESMTP; 16 Oct 2019 15:14:09 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 0/4] [RFC] Migrate Pages in lieu of discard To: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Cc: linux-mm@kvack.org, dan.j.williams@intel.com, Dave Hansen From: Dave Hansen Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2019 15:11:48 -0700 Message-Id: <20191016221148.F9CCD155@viggo.jf.intel.com> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org We're starting to see systems with more and more kinds of memory such as Intel's implementation of persistent memory. Let's say you have a system with some DRAM and some persistent memory. Today, once DRAM fills up, reclaim will start and some of the DRAM contents will be thrown out. Allocations will, at some point, start falling over to the slower persistent memory. That has two nasty properties. First, the newer allocations can end up in the slower persistent memory. Second, reclaimed data in DRAM are just discarded even if there are gobs of space in persistent memory that could be used. This set implements a solution to these problems. At the end of the reclaim process in shrink_page_list() just before the last page refcount is dropped, the page is migrated to persistent memory instead of being dropped. While I've talked about a DRAM/PMEM pairing, this approach would function in any environment where memory tiers exist. This is not perfect. It "strands" pages in slower memory and never brings them back to fast DRAM. Other things need to be built to promote hot pages back to DRAM. This is part of a larger patch set. If you want to apply these or play with them, I'd suggest using the tree from here. It includes autonuma-based hot page promotion back to DRAM: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/c3d6de4d-f7c3-b505-2e64-8ee5f70b2118@intel.com This is also all based on an upstream mechanism that allows persistent memory to be onlined and used as if it were volatile: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190124231441.37A4A305@viggo.jf.intel.com