From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.6 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DCE1FECE58E for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:12:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B07EC2082C for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:12:21 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1571310741; bh=76l3i1G8HTHzJ9MlFVy8c4dsAdw53/MmCstigaLV8wM=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=WbqcBYeDhZE2bwpksoRWE3+tWPAwfLZ/vXmoRDxvhSM5Ef+kVO0cVHVheUxzswHbq eAojR3W4da2Go81+stf3sYE8KzDonSIvflRNLT0IoYm7Bu89L06ZcAj8L9xSbMiAW9 4ZsVvaB+w+qr5QJcAIjJAch6vhPVzycwZmwXu5dU= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2502078AbfJQLMU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:12:20 -0400 Received: from heliosphere.sirena.org.uk ([172.104.155.198]:33574 "EHLO heliosphere.sirena.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2502068AbfJQLMU (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 07:12:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=sirena.org.uk; s=20170815-heliosphere; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=hu92kkg/rOG7H1uhawHnfkVXpSc0yt/8yzcgxVqHn6M=; b=KfPKdlCJZtg1+QqDDMACBohJ4 nOwvwQT3jnWe3ml7rxiHpiVcbuGR+fqnkoG5zya3ECIaBTvmCLivMwizmQGeeUucAcJ60vhQtDoRL bnGGNVwtaW4lV4rx5OMTfMLV+okrJpZxuEVrgZc1ENumUN71ugIMVxf5K9kTcImU/KsWI=; Received: from cpc102320-sgyl38-2-0-cust46.18-2.cable.virginm.net ([82.37.168.47] helo=ypsilon.sirena.org.uk) by heliosphere.sirena.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iL3gv-0000mV-PU; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 11:11:37 +0000 Received: by ypsilon.sirena.org.uk (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 200EC2742BAC; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:11:37 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:11:37 +0100 From: Mark Brown To: Yuehaibing Cc: codrin.ciubotariu@microchip.com, lgirdwood@gmail.com, perex@perex.cz, tiwai@suse.com, nicolas.ferre@microchip.com, alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com, mirq-linux@rere.qmqm.pl, alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] ASoC: atmel: Fix build error Message-ID: <20191017111137.GB4976@sirena.co.uk> References: <20190928081641.44232-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: X-Cookie: Shut off engine before fueling. User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Thu, Oct 17, 2019 at 03:32:01PM +0800, Yuehaibing wrote: > ping..., this issue still in linux-next 20191017 Please don't send content free pings and please allow a reasonable time for review. People get busy, go on holiday, attend conferences and so=20 on so unless there is some reason for urgency (like critical bug fixes) please allow at least a couple of weeks for review. If there have been review comments then people may be waiting for those to be addressed. Sending content free pings adds to the mail volume (if they are seen at all) which is often the problem and since they can't be reviewed directly if something has gone wrong you'll have to resend the patches anyway, so sending again is generally a better approach though there are some other maintainers who like them - if in doubt look at how patches for the subsystem are normally handled. --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAABCgAdFiEEreZoqmdXGLWf4p/qJNaLcl1Uh9AFAl2oTGgACgkQJNaLcl1U h9DLQgf/bpKGur09JNKSVcz4fizyK0a7jmcFtSjI2sF5Yi7dqr8rGWgMJuQ6lXnd yKAo3kNfJkakIcpLAe+5JFWjvLSfOPdlbn+pvA9DO30LWUU9yfZpiwJh8DCCmzHf VtLwbaYEn2Lz3+7pfSQ+vOjqA07HaBXLvpgu+eL+HcGCAQQ0xiBSEBW0/X1k6Nzi raR3jYrrFXeqn03GlAdjfcwa0MOx3HO134aU2hDCRLoi0DZsi8mjsEmi5eTW+lTg BSmJmUTgMBX0EKsscrwJnR66qX+Slx9d2pL0DO48viIRUqz84Ro0I3w6XlBT02Fi YCa34N8RkRi0nIf++MH8GlzSZYp67w== =StwZ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Pd0ReVV5GZGQvF3a--