From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_2 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5A81AECE58E for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3BE9021835 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:45:37 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2437028AbfJQRpg (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:45:36 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:44102 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S2389827AbfJQRpf (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:45:35 -0400 Received: from gandalf.local.home (cpe-66-24-58-225.stny.res.rr.com [66.24.58.225]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B1D5B20820; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:45:34 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:45:26 -0400 From: Steven Rostedt To: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo Cc: Tzvetomir Stoyanov , Jiri Olsa , Namhyung Kim , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: [BUG] libtraceevent: perf script -g python segfaults Message-ID: <20191017134526.097f1490@gandalf.local.home> In-Reply-To: <20191017154205.GC8974@kernel.org> References: <20191017154205.GC8974@kernel.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 3.17.3 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 17 Oct 2019 12:42:05 -0300 Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo wrote: > I'll try and continue later, but if you guys can take a look... > > The first call in that loop: > > while ((event = trace_find_next_event(pevent, event))) > > works and the event is valid, one of the sched: tracepoints, but then > the next call returns this: > > struct tep_event *trace_find_next_event(struct tep_handle *pevent, > struct tep_event *event) > { > static int idx; > int events_count; > struct tep_event *all_events; > > all_events = tep_get_first_event(pevent); > events_count = tep_get_events_count(pevent); > if (!pevent || !all_events || events_count < 1) > return NULL; > > if (!event) { > idx = 0; > return all_events; > } > > if (idx < events_count && event == (all_events + idx)) { > idx++; > if (idx == events_count) > return NULL; > return (all_events + idx); > } > > for (idx = 1; idx < events_count; idx++) { > if (event == (all_events + (idx - 1))) > return (all_events + idx); > } > return NULL; > } > > Oh, static int idx, oops, anyway, the all_events + idx returned for the > second call to trace_find_next_event() fails, in a hurry now, will get > back to this later. Yeah, this is obviously broken. :-( I'll have a patch later today. -- Steve