From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A5F22ECE58D for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8973320872 for ; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 17:19:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2436741AbfJQRT2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:19:28 -0400 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:42748 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1728639AbfJQRT1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 17 Oct 2019 13:19:27 -0400 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id B322368BE1; Thu, 17 Oct 2019 19:19:24 +0200 (CEST) Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2019 19:19:24 +0200 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Christoph Hellwig , Borislav Petkov , paul.walmsley@sifive.com, palmer@sifive.com, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, linux-edac@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Yash Shah Subject: Re: [PATCH] riscv: move sifive_l2_cache.c to drivers/soc Message-ID: <20191017171924.GA10928@lst.de> References: <20190818082935.14869-1-hch@lst.de> <20190819060904.GA4841@zn.tnic> <20190819062619.GA20211@lst.de> <20190822062635.00f6e507@coco.lan> <20190927225304.GA18456@lst.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20190927225304.GA18456@lst.de> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Mauro, can you Ack this patch? On Sat, Sep 28, 2019 at 12:53:04AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > > well enough myself, and I really need to get this code out of the > > > forced on RISC-V codebase as some SOCs I'm working with simply don't > > > have the memory for it.. > > > > > > So unless someone signs up to do a per-IP block edac drivers instead > > > very quickly I'd still like to see something like this go into 5.4 > > > for now. > > > > I'm wandering if we should at least add an entry for this one at > > MAINTAINERS, pointing it to the EDAC mailing list. Something like: > > Sounds fine. Can you also ACK the patch with that, as Paul mention > in another thread he wants an EDAC ACK for it. ---end quoted text---