From: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
To: Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>
Cc: "Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
linux-pm@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
nico@fluxnic.net
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 4/5] cpufreq: vexpress-spc: remove lots of debug messages
Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2019 07:00:54 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191018060054.GE31836@e107533-lin.cambridge.arm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191018055720.za3a5zeqdzcupc4h@vireshk-i7>
On Fri, Oct 18, 2019 at 11:27:20AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> On 17-10-19, 13:35, Sudeep Holla wrote:
> > This driver have been used and tested for year now and the extensive
> > debug/log messages in the driver are not really required anymore.
> > Get rid of those unnecessary log messages.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Sudeep Holla <sudeep.holla@arm.com>
> > ---
> > drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c | 72 +++++---------------------
> > 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 59 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c b/drivers/cpufreq/vexpress-spc-cpufreq.c
> > static void put_cluster_clk_and_freq_table(struct device *cpu_dev,
> > @@ -324,11 +296,9 @@ static void put_cluster_clk_and_freq_table(struct device *cpu_dev,
> >
> > for_each_present_cpu(i) {
> > struct device *cdev = get_cpu_device(i);
> > - if (!cdev) {
> > - pr_err("%s: failed to get cpu%d device\n", __func__, i);
> > - return;
> > - }
> >
> > + if (!cdev)
> > + return;
>
> We had a blank line after this, which isn't there in your version
> anymore. Please keep that here and few more places below.
>
Ah, this one is spurious change when doing in bulk not intended. I will
add back the blank line.
--
Regards,
Sudeep
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-18 6:01 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-17 12:35 [PATCH v2 0/5] cpufreq: merge arm big.LITTLE and vexpress-spc drivers Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 1/5] cpufreq: scpi: remove stale/outdated comment about the driver Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 2/5] cpufreq: merge arm_big_little and vexpress-spc Sudeep Holla
2019-10-18 5:47 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 5:50 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 3/5] cpufreq: vexpress-spc: drop unnessary cpufreq_arm_bL_ops abstraction Sudeep Holla
2019-10-17 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 4/5] cpufreq: vexpress-spc: remove lots of debug messages Sudeep Holla
2019-10-18 5:57 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 6:00 ` Sudeep Holla [this message]
2019-10-17 12:35 ` [PATCH v2 5/5] cpufreq: vexpress-spc: fix some coding style issues Sudeep Holla
2019-10-18 5:55 ` Viresh Kumar
2019-10-18 5:59 ` Sudeep Holla
2019-10-18 15:51 ` Nicolas Pitre
2019-10-17 16:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/5] cpufreq: merge arm big.LITTLE and vexpress-spc drivers Nicolas Pitre
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191018060054.GE31836@e107533-lin.cambridge.arm.com \
--to=sudeep.holla@arm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-pm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=nico@fluxnic.net \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®