From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.0 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_INVALID,DKIM_SIGNED, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, URIBL_BLOCKED,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C6142CA9EB6 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9986C21928 for ; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 18:26:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=fail reason="signature verification failed" (2048-bit key) header.d=armlinux.org.uk header.i=@armlinux.org.uk header.b="0JmadXmX" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389501AbfJWS02 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:26:28 -0400 Received: from pandora.armlinux.org.uk ([78.32.30.218]:35378 "EHLO pandora.armlinux.org.uk" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1732810AbfJWS02 (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Oct 2019 14:26:28 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=armlinux.org.uk; s=pandora-2019; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date: Resent-From:Resent-Sender:Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id: List-Help:List-Unsubscribe:List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=ilfsvkQZhflxpwApssuF0SxtHAiqATDZH9AtW7X4oPs=; b=0JmadXmXYKwJL2c+ZhpX92FTQ mhe5+ZtixqNGmRC6SrFXmSvi05PSDLOESRYUhXWzvZluFGISA0LCgG6vM3ELBuUo2rKkg//DkRJhO gweIiJdxFnwhr/rntlzGxs5ZZ1e6RYo06In0ahN4mL3ZWMX0ZwHEL+5BaJdB2enbSn2mfi/OKVET+ TaXy1f7tO6jsQvwXhSIv2sClqlP6fZsgVRPVOFVY0SZuaSh7ZB4/41v+ZmPxjkBWpsXVbgiSJPdck n77nBTt+E14t7DvtTxmLiJVRFAK6kEXG6FFBKcGQKiRNqATik5H9BgMm61Gfnu02946w6ZcHsK7TQ hzbF6bOlA==; Received: from shell.armlinux.org.uk ([2001:4d48:ad52:3201:5054:ff:fe00:4ec]:46520) by pandora.armlinux.org.uk with esmtpsa (TLSv1.2:ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1iNLKu-0006h6-Jl; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:26:20 +0100 Received: from linux by shell.armlinux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iNLKs-0005ki-FT; Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:26:18 +0100 Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:26:18 +0100 From: Russell King - ARM Linux admin To: Mark Brown Cc: Jerome Brunet , Liam Girdwood , alsa-devel@alsa-project.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] Revert "ASoC: hdmi-codec: re-introduce mutex locking" Message-ID: <20191023182618.GC25745@shell.armlinux.org.uk> References: <20191023161203.28955-1-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <20191023161203.28955-2-jbrunet@baylibre.com> <20191023163716.GI5723@sirena.co.uk> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191023163716.GI5723@sirena.co.uk> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 05:37:16PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 06:12:02PM +0200, Jerome Brunet wrote: > > This reverts commit eb1ecadb7f67dde94ef0efd3ddaed5cb6c9a65ed. > > > > This fixes the following warning reported by lockdep and a potential > > issue with hibernation > > Please submit patches using subject lines reflecting the style for the > subsystem, this makes it easier for people to identify relevant patches. > Look at what existing commits in the area you're changing are doing and > make sure your subject lines visually resemble what they're doing. > There's no need to resubmit to fix this alone. Hi Mark, If you look at the git log for reverted commits, the vast majority of them follow _this_ style. From 5.3 back to the start of current git history, there are 3665 commits with "Revert" in their subject line, 3050 of those start with "Revert" with no subsystem prefix. It seems that there are a small number of subsystems that want something different, ASoC included. That will be an ongoing problem, people won't remember which want it when the majority don't. Maybe the revert format should be standardised in some manner? -- RMK's Patch system: https://www.armlinux.org.uk/developer/patches/ FTTC broadband for 0.8mile line in suburbia: sync at 12.1Mbps down 622kbps up According to speedtest.net: 11.9Mbps down 500kbps up