From: Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@pengutronix.de>
To: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
Cc: richard@nod.at, dedekind1@gmail.com, yi.zhang@huawei.com,
linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ubifs: do_kill_orphans: Fix a memory leak bug
Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 10:20:57 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191029092057.fsklsibqrmbmacar@pengutronix.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1572339670-68694-1-git-send-email-chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
On Tue, Oct 29, 2019 at 05:01:10PM +0800, Zhihao Cheng wrote:
> If there are more than one valid snod on the sleb->nodes list,
> do_kill_orphans will malloc ino more than once without releasing
> previous ino's memory. Finally, it will trigger memory leak.
>
> Fixes: ee1438ce5dc4 ("ubifs: Check link count of inodes when...")
> Signed-off-by: Zhihao Cheng <chengzhihao1@huawei.com>
> Signed-off-by: zhangyi (F) <yi.zhang@huawei.com>
> ---
> fs/ubifs/orphan.c | 8 +++++---
> 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
> index 3b4b411..f211ed3 100644
> --- a/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
> +++ b/fs/ubifs/orphan.c
> @@ -673,9 +673,11 @@ static int do_kill_orphans(struct ubifs_info *c, struct ubifs_scan_leb *sleb,
> if (first)
> first = 0;
>
> - ino = kmalloc(UBIFS_MAX_INO_NODE_SZ, GFP_NOFS);
> - if (!ino)
> - return -ENOMEM;
> + if (!ino) {
> + ino = kmalloc(UBIFS_MAX_INO_NODE_SZ, GFP_NOFS);
> + if (!ino)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> + }
This solves only part of the problem. There are several places in the
loop that just return instead of jumping to out_free. These need to be
fixed as well.
I am not sure if it's worth it to allocate ino on demand. It would be
more straight forward to allocate it once initially before the loop.
Not sure though what Richard prefers.
Regards,
Sascha
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Industrial Linux Solutions | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Peiner Str. 6-8, 31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-10-29 9:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-10-29 9:01 Zhihao Cheng
2019-10-29 9:20 ` Sascha Hauer [this message]
2019-10-29 10:25 ` Richard Weinberger
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191029092057.fsklsibqrmbmacar@pengutronix.de \
--to=s.hauer@pengutronix.de \
--cc=chengzhihao1@huawei.com \
--cc=dedekind1@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mtd@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=richard@nod.at \
--cc=yi.zhang@huawei.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®