From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23356CA9EB9 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 05:07:42 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D4C7F20679 for ; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 05:07:41 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="NrkxL5DN" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1731829AbfJ2FHj (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 01:07:39 -0400 Received: from ozlabs.org ([203.11.71.1]:50809 "EHLO ozlabs.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1731547AbfJ2FHi (ORCPT ); Tue, 29 Oct 2019 01:07:38 -0400 Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (P-256) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 472KMp2YvRz9sPV; Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:07:34 +1100 (AEDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1572325656; bh=cjVSQ2LeMyLilTOrYL1B1Dp8AyZuyPWwP4ayARVor8M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=NrkxL5DNaqn/fFPvdXlvKguLF+D5zjiI7p+g88YE9sqP78SRoWgA614JHSEjxujlo mulVx26SU8rT0Ox7178eD1fsvm+WbIGLwRskp7evaKug6mtD8q0kGWkG0t7K+1NjHZ Bs52PB1LHiyc9xMFgNaEfIcWRRwgStyKEQJLKehGWDr1gXUHoDsQx0J6dzW7BTLCij qWBx+M5Zl292rAn3U/v5cNXMda03Q7d0ZxCmEOjbE84dp3soqBIoEd1VOadyJbGqh6 xUVELfHbZuA2Sgip3SFAWOVbmemTP80AsGLaGnekmHu+6KUp8FergJBQbFHWRhkOwH k9gaf91CUoH8Q== Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2019 16:07:33 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Christoph Hellwig Cc: Boaz Harrosh , linux-fsdevel , Miklos Szeredi , Alexander Viro , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: Please add the zuf tree to linux-next Message-ID: <20191029160733.298c6539@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20191024023606.GA1884@infradead.org> References: <1b192a85-e1da-0925-ef26-178b93d0aa45@plexistor.com> <20191024023606.GA1884@infradead.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/DNRAmrpHoq6Pd+umJSouVY0"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/DNRAmrpHoq6Pd+umJSouVY0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Christoph, On Wed, 23 Oct 2019 19:36:06 -0700 Christoph Hellwig wr= ote: > > On Thu, Oct 24, 2019 at 03:34:29AM +0300, Boaz Harrosh wrote: > > Hello Stephen > >=20 > > Please add the zuf tree below to the linux-next tree. > > [https://github.com/NetApp/zufs-zuf zuf] =20 >=20 > I don't remember us coming to the conclusion that this actually is > useful doesn't just badly duplicate the fuse functionality. So is that a hard Nak on inclusion in linux-next at this time? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/DNRAmrpHoq6Pd+umJSouVY0 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAl23yRUACgkQAVBC80lX 0GwIiAgAoL3ldh/i+LtJQynaMn2qgEcke4R5IfGsrq08bxO9xczz48rlUAwwGY3i Xre4GQ/G4jZSiNcHHXnBtgA9habyNVb4yqmhJnQav/x6m+wQmE3lxlp6FaIWV4TJ eOWY3XUiNyYGPQVzVgpNvor8oIz1vTYodw2NbpoakoTYnbdz5S3mwMWAbLK/i8V5 MZ12qTE8QrMxAGqPWZeEXW7tpPMvNvyJh3wqWF8dNETWQ9SSfMfeVA/Kc162eGYT t++EuUdmMcLXpjhUDjeoN0cW+Equ3E5JZ+jNbBQ/UIBBAYj7gDdns/jRSrXp++54 RtlRL2TApKLbNKRisNddCuCOO+bF+w== =Jukb -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/DNRAmrpHoq6Pd+umJSouVY0--