mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>
To: Lai Jiangshan <laijs@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Josh Triplett <josh@joshtriplett.org>,
	Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
	Mathieu Desnoyers <mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com>,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	Joel Fernandes <joel@joelfernandes.org>,
	rcu@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2 0/7] rcu: introduce percpu rcu_preempt_depth
Date: Sat, 2 Nov 2019 08:05:45 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191102150545.GQ20975@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191102124559.1135-1-laijs@linux.alibaba.com>

On Sat, Nov 02, 2019 at 12:45:52PM +0000, Lai Jiangshan wrote:
> Rather than using the generic version of preempt_count, x86 uses
> a special version of preempt_count implementation that take advantage
> of x86 (single instruction to access/add/decl/flip-bits of percpu
> counter). It makes the preempt_count operations really cheap.
> 
> For x86, rcu_preempt_depth can also take the same advantage by
> using the same technique.
> 
> After the patchset:
>  - No function call when using rcu_read_[un]lock().
>      It is minor improvement, other arch can also achieve it via
>      moving ->rcu_read_lock_nesting and ->rcu_read_unlock_special
>      to thread_info, but inlined rcu_read_[un]lock() generates
>      more instructions and footprint in other arch generally.
>  - Only single instruction for rcu_read_lock().
>  - Only 2 instructions for the fast path of rcu_read_unlock().
> 
> Patch4 simplifies rcu_read_unlock() by avoid using negative
> ->rcu_read_lock_nesting, Patch7 introduces the percpu rcu_preempt_depth.
> Other patches are for preparation.
> 
> changed from v1:
>   drop patch1/2 of the v1
>   drop merged patches
> 
>   Using special.b.deferred_qs to avoid wakeup in v1 is changed to using
>   preempt_count. And special.b.deferred_qs is removed.
> 
> Lai Jiangshan (7):
>   rcu: use preempt_count to test whether scheduler locks is held
>   rcu: cleanup rcu_preempt_deferred_qs()
>   rcu: remove useless special.b.deferred_qs
>   rcu: don't use negative ->rcu_read_lock_nesting
>   rcu: wrap usages of rcu_read_lock_nesting
>   rcu: clear the special.b.need_qs in rcu_note_context_switch()
>   x86,rcu: use percpu rcu_preempt_depth

I am getting on a plane shortly, so what I have done is start a longish
rcutorture test on these.  I will take a look at them later on.

And I presume that answers to my questions on some of the patches in
this series will be forthcoming.  ;-)

							Thanx, Paul

>  arch/x86/Kconfig                         |   2 +
>  arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h |  87 +++++++++++++++++++
>  arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c             |   7 ++
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_32.c             |   2 +
>  arch/x86/kernel/process_64.c             |   2 +
>  include/linux/rcupdate.h                 |  24 ++++++
>  include/linux/sched.h                    |   2 +-
>  init/init_task.c                         |   2 +-
>  kernel/fork.c                            |   2 +-
>  kernel/rcu/Kconfig                       |   3 +
>  kernel/rcu/tree_exp.h                    |  35 ++------
>  kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h                 | 101 ++++++++++++++---------
>  12 files changed, 196 insertions(+), 73 deletions(-)
>  create mode 100644 arch/x86/include/asm/rcu_preempt_depth.h
> 
> -- 
> 2.20.1
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-02 15:05 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 39+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-02 12:45 Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-02 12:45 ` [PATCH V2 1/7] rcu: use preempt_count to test whether scheduler locks is held Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-15 16:53   ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-19  3:31   ` Joel Fernandes
2020-02-19  3:59     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-02 12:45 ` [PATCH V2 2/7] rcu: cleanup rcu_preempt_deferred_qs() Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-03  2:01   ` Boqun Feng
2019-11-03  5:01     ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-04 14:55       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-05  2:09         ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-05  7:19           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-11 14:32             ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-12  1:28               ` Lai Jiangshan
2020-02-17 23:23                 ` Paul E. McKenney
2020-02-18 14:41                   ` Steven Rostedt
2020-02-18 16:43                     ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-15 16:55   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-02 12:45 ` [PATCH V2 3/7] rcu: remove useless special.b.deferred_qs Lai Jiangshan
2020-02-17 23:23   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-02 12:45 ` [PATCH V2 4/7] rcu: don't use negative ->rcu_read_lock_nesting Lai Jiangshan
2020-02-17 23:26   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-02 12:45 ` [PATCH V2 5/7] rcu: wrap usages of rcu_read_lock_nesting Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-15 22:25   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-02 12:45 ` [PATCH V2 6/7] rcu: clear the special.b.need_qs in rcu_note_context_switch() Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-16 15:46   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-02 12:45 ` [PATCH V2 7/7] x86,rcu: use percpu rcu_preempt_depth Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-02 16:30   ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-03  4:33     ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-04  9:25   ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-11-04 11:41     ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-04 12:09       ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
2019-11-16 15:48   ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-18  2:02     ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-18 14:59       ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-19  1:59         ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-19 21:14           ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-20  2:47             ` Lai Jiangshan
2019-11-21  4:02               ` Paul E. McKenney
2019-11-02 15:05 ` Paul E. McKenney [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20191102150545.GQ20975@paulmck-ThinkPad-P72 \
    --to=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=joel@joelfernandes.org \
    --cc=josh@joshtriplett.org \
    --cc=laijs@linux.alibaba.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mathieu.desnoyers@efficios.com \
    --cc=rcu@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®