From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2FF9DCA9EB5 for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:29:22 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F26AC2080F for ; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 15:29:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728701AbfKDP3U (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:29:20 -0500 Received: from verein.lst.de ([213.95.11.211]:39585 "EHLO verein.lst.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727796AbfKDP3U (ORCPT ); Mon, 4 Nov 2019 10:29:20 -0500 Received: by verein.lst.de (Postfix, from userid 2407) id 396F668BFE; Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:29:17 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 4 Nov 2019 16:29:16 +0100 From: Christoph Hellwig To: Keith Busch Cc: Marta Rybczynska , Charles Machalow , Christoph Hellwig , linux-nvme , axboe , Sagi Grimberg , linux-kernel Subject: Re: [PATCH] nvme: change nvme_passthru_cmd64's result field. Message-ID: <20191104152916.GB17050@lst.de> References: <20191031050338.12700-1-csm10495@gmail.com> <20191031133921.GA4763@lst.de> <1977598237.90293761.1572878080625.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> <871357470.90297451.1572879417091.JavaMail.zimbra@kalray.eu> <20191104150151.GA26808@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20191104150151.GA26808@redsun51.ssa.fujisawa.hgst.com> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.17 (2007-11-01) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, Nov 05, 2019 at 12:01:51AM +0900, Keith Busch wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 03:56:57PM +0100, Marta Rybczynska wrote: > > ----- On 4 Nov, 2019, at 15:51, Charles Machalow csm10495@gmail.com wrote: > > > > > For this one yes, UAPI size changes. Though I believe this IOCTL > > > hasn't been in a released Kernel yet (just RC). Technically it may be > > > changeable as a fix until the next Kernel is released. I do think its > > > a useful enough > > > change to warrant a late fix. > > > > The old one is in UAPI for years. The new one is not yet, right. I'm OK > > to change the new structure. To have compatibility you would have to use > > the new structure (at least its size) in the user space code. This is > > what you'd liek to do? > > Charles is proposing only to modify the recently introduced 64-bit ioctl > struct without touching the existing 32 bit version. He just wanted the > lower 32-bits of the 64-bit result to occupy the same space as the 32-bit > ioctl's result. That space in the 64-bit version is currently occupied > by an implicit struct padding. Except on 32-bit x86, which does not have the padding. Which is why the current layout is so bad, as it breaks 32-it x86 compat.