From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50566C43331 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 24C0321925 for ; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 19:57:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727507AbfKKT5R (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:57:17 -0500 Received: from metis.ext.pengutronix.de ([85.220.165.71]:43631 "EHLO metis.ext.pengutronix.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726979AbfKKT5Q (ORCPT ); Mon, 11 Nov 2019 14:57:16 -0500 Received: from pty.hi.pengutronix.de ([2001:67c:670:100:1d::c5]) by metis.ext.pengutronix.de with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1iUFoH-0003xS-PD; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:57:13 +0100 Received: from ukl by pty.hi.pengutronix.de with local (Exim 4.89) (envelope-from ) id 1iUFoG-0000LR-Vz; Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:57:13 +0100 Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2019 20:57:12 +0100 From: Uwe =?iso-8859-1?Q?Kleine-K=F6nig?= To: Markus Elfring Cc: linux-pwm@vger.kernel.org, Neil Armstrong , Neil Brown , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org, LKML , Thierry Reding , kernel@pengutronix.de Subject: Re: [0/4] pwm: omap-dmtimer: Software improvements Message-ID: <20191111195712.mmk7f23cjson6e6x@pengutronix.de> References: <20191111071952.6pbswbboqreen6im@pengutronix.de> <20191111090357.13903-1-u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de> <20191111091606.qf7gj5gln3khfnsl@pengutronix.de> <3672014f-14f2-7568-8258-bc472f3b9ae1@web.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <3672014f-14f2-7568-8258-bc472f3b9ae1@web.de> User-Agent: NeoMutt/20170113 (1.7.2) X-SA-Exim-Connect-IP: 2001:67c:670:100:1d::c5 X-SA-Exim-Mail-From: ukl@pengutronix.de X-SA-Exim-Scanned: No (on metis.ext.pengutronix.de); SAEximRunCond expanded to false X-PTX-Original-Recipient: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Nov 11, 2019 at 02:28:52PM +0100, Markus Elfring wrote: > > I created a cover letter but failed to send it together with the series > > :-| > > Did you omit the address “linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org” from > the recipient list intentionally? Yes, even though it's documented to Cc: all patches there, there is IMHO little use. If there is a dedicated mailing list, not adding lkml is fine for all maintainers I interacted with in the last few years. The volume on lkml is that high that sending all patches there only adds noise. Best regards Uwe -- Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König | Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |