From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Jacek Anaszewski <jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@tencent.com>, Pavel Machek <pavel@ucw.cz>,
Benjamin Herrenschmidt <benh@kernel.crashing.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Yauheni Kaliuta <yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com>,
"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@linaro.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/9] sched/vtime: Handle nice updates under vtime
Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2019 11:14:45 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191115101445.GB4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191106030807.31091-4-frederic@kernel.org>
On Wed, Nov 06, 2019 at 04:08:01AM +0100, Frederic Weisbecker wrote:
> diff --git a/kernel/sched/core.c b/kernel/sched/core.c
> index 7880f4f64d0e..fa56a1bdd5d8 100644
> --- a/kernel/sched/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/sched/core.c
> @@ -4488,6 +4488,7 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
> int old_prio, delta;
> struct rq_flags rf;
> struct rq *rq;
> + int old_static;
>
> if (task_nice(p) == nice || nice < MIN_NICE || nice > MAX_NICE)
> return;
> @@ -4498,6 +4499,8 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
> rq = task_rq_lock(p, &rf);
> update_rq_clock(rq);
>
> + old_static = p->static_prio;
> +
> /*
> * The RT priorities are set via sched_setscheduler(), but we still
> * allow the 'normal' nice value to be set - but as expected
> @@ -4532,7 +4535,9 @@ void set_user_nice(struct task_struct *p, long nice)
> }
> if (running)
> set_next_task(rq, p);
> +
> out_unlock:
> + vtime_set_nice(rq, p, old_static);
> task_rq_unlock(rq, p, &rf);
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL(set_user_nice);
> @@ -4668,8 +4673,8 @@ static struct task_struct *find_process_by_pid(pid_t pid)
> */
> #define SETPARAM_POLICY -1
>
> -static void __setscheduler_params(struct task_struct *p,
> - const struct sched_attr *attr)
> +static void __setscheduler_params(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> + const struct sched_attr *attr)
> {
> int policy = attr->sched_policy;
>
> @@ -4680,8 +4685,11 @@ static void __setscheduler_params(struct task_struct *p,
>
> if (dl_policy(policy))
> __setparam_dl(p, attr);
> - else if (fair_policy(policy))
> + else if (fair_policy(policy)) {
> + int old_prio = p->static_prio;
> p->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(attr->sched_nice);
> + vtime_set_nice(rq, p, old_prio);
> + }
>
> /*
> * __sched_setscheduler() ensures attr->sched_priority == 0 when
> @@ -4704,7 +4712,7 @@ static void __setscheduler(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *p,
> if (attr->sched_flags & SCHED_FLAG_KEEP_PARAMS)
> return;
>
> - __setscheduler_params(p, attr);
> + __setscheduler_params(rq, p, attr);
>
> /*
> * Keep a potential priority boosting if called from
Would it make sense to add a helper like:
static void
__sched_set_nice(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *t, long nice)
{
int old_prio;
old_prio = t->static_prio;
t->static_prio = NICE_TO_PRIO(nice);
vtime_set_nice(rq, t, old_prio);
}
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-15 10:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-06 3:07 [PATCH 0/9] sched/nohz: Make the rest of kcpustat vtime aware Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-06 3:07 ` [PATCH 1/9] sched/cputime: Allow to pass cputime index on user/guest accounting Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 2/9] sched/cputime: Standardize the kcpustat index based accounting functions Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 3/9] sched/vtime: Handle nice updates under vtime Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-15 10:14 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-11-15 10:16 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 10:18 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-15 15:27 ` Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-18 13:04 ` Peter Zijlstra
2019-11-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 4/9] sched/cputime: Support other fields on kcpustat_field() Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 5/9] sched/vtime: Bring all-in-one kcpustat accessor for vtime fields Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 6/9] procfs: Use all-in-one vtime aware kcpustat accessor Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 7/9] cpufreq: Use vtime aware kcpustat accessors for user time Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 8/9] leds: Use all-in-one vtime aware kcpustat accessor Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-06 3:08 ` [PATCH 9/9] rackmeter: Use " Frederic Weisbecker
2019-11-14 15:25 ` [PATCH 0/9] sched/nohz: Make the rest of kcpustat vtime aware Frederic Weisbecker
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191115101445.GB4131@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=benh@kernel.crashing.org \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=jacek.anaszewski@gmail.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=pavel@ucw.cz \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=viresh.kumar@linaro.org \
--cc=wanpengli@tencent.com \
--cc=yauheni.kaliuta@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®