From: Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>
To: Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@intel.com>
Cc: "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"x86@kernel.org" <x86@kernel.org>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
"Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>,
Rik van Riel <riel@surriel.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@intel.com>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@intel.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Fix small issues before adding supervisor xstates
Date: Fri, 22 Nov 2019 22:54:59 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191122215459.GM6289@zn.tnic> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b33151bdfb5611de7db8493cb8fcca4b8f372267.camel@intel.com>
On Fri, Nov 22, 2019 at 01:22:37PM -0800, Yu-cheng Yu wrote:
> This implicitly converts a u32 to a bool. By looking at it, I think it
> should be OK, but wonder if anything overlooked? I would be happy to
> make this a separate patch.
I don't understand your question: are you asking whether you should
convert the functions to "static bool" or what is your question?
If it is that, then yes pls. Also, change xfeature_is_user() to return
bool too, while at it.
Thx.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-22 21:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-09-25 15:10 [PATCH 0/6] Support XSAVES supervisor states Yu-cheng Yu
2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 1/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Fix small issues before adding supervisor xstates Yu-cheng Yu
2019-10-09 15:58 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-11-22 21:22 ` Yu-cheng Yu
2019-11-22 21:54 ` Borislav Petkov [this message]
2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 2/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Define new macros for supervisor and user xstates Yu-cheng Yu
2019-10-09 16:17 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 3/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Separate user and supervisor xfeatures mask Yu-cheng Yu
2019-10-09 16:59 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 4/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Introduce XSAVES supervisor states Yu-cheng Yu
2019-10-09 17:10 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 5/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Define new functions for clearing fpregs and xstates Yu-cheng Yu
2019-10-09 17:28 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-09-25 15:10 ` [PATCH 6/6] x86/fpu/xstate: Rename validate_xstate_header() to validate_xstate_header_from_user() Yu-cheng Yu
2019-10-09 17:31 ` Borislav Petkov
2019-10-09 22:10 ` Yu-cheng Yu
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191122215459.GM6289@zn.tnic \
--to=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=fenghua.yu@intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=ravi.v.shankar@intel.com \
--cc=riel@surriel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
--cc=yu-cheng.yu@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®