From: Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>,
Peter Zijlstra <a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] x86/iopl changes for v5.5
Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2019 20:24:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191125192456.GA46001@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125161626.GA956@gmail.com>
* Ingo Molnar <mingo@kernel.org> wrote:
> Linus,
>
> Please pull the latest x86-iopl-for-linus git tree from:
>
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git x86-iopl-for-linus
>
> # HEAD: e3cb0c7102f04c83bf1a7cb1d052e92749310b46 x86/ioperm: Fix use of deprecated config option
>
> This tree implements a nice simplification of the iopl and ioperm code
> that Thomas Gleixner discovered: we can implement the IO privilege
> features of the iopl system call by using the IO permission bitmap in
> permissive mode, while trapping CLI/STI/POPF/PUSHF uses in user-space if
> they change the interrupt flag.
>
> This tree implements that feature, with testing facilities and related
> cleanups.
Forgot to list the conflicts that may arise if you merge this after the
other x86 bits.
Firstly the symbol bits would conflict here:
arch/x86/entry/entry_32.S
arch/x86/kernel/head_32.S
arch/x86/xen/xen-asm_32.S
I've resolved them in tip:WIP.x86/asm if you want to double check:
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/tip/tip.git WIP.x86/asm
but usually you do the resolutions better. :-)
There's also a conflict in arch/x86/include/asm/pgtable_32_types.h.
But there's also a semantic conflict that would trigger if you pull this
after the x86/urgent bits, interacting with:
05b042a19443: ("x86/pti/32: Calculate the various PTI cpu_entry_area sizes correctly, make the CPU_ENTRY_AREA_PAGES assert precise")
After that commit the CPU_ENTRY_AREA_PAGES value has to be precise, and
edited to 41 in the merge commit if I did everything write with the pull
requests.
This too is resolved in tip:WIP.x86/asm, in the following merge commits:
22d7b9359a9a: ("Merge branch 'x86/iopl' into x86/asm, to resolve conflicts")
7543765dd362: ("Merge branch 'x86/urgent' into x86/iopl, to resolve conflicts")
Thanks,
Ingo
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-25 19:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-25 16:16 Ingo Molnar
2019-11-25 19:24 ` Ingo Molnar [this message]
2019-11-26 9:45 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-26 21:04 ` [GIT PULL] x86/urgent fix " Ingo Molnar
2019-11-27 1:30 ` pr-tracker-bot
2019-11-26 19:30 ` [GIT PULL] x86/iopl changes " pr-tracker-bot
2019-11-26 19:33 ` Linus Torvalds
2019-11-26 19:50 ` Ingo Molnar
2019-11-26 20:02 ` Ingo Molnar
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191125192456.GA46001@gmail.com \
--to=mingo@kernel.org \
--cc=a.p.zijlstra@chello.nl \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=luto@kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome