From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org, Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 STABLE] KVM: MMU: Do not treat ZONE_DEVICE pages as being reserved
Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2019 09:14:50 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191126081450.GB1233188@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20191125190456.28679-1-sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
On Mon, Nov 25, 2019 at 11:04:56AM -0800, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> [ Upstream commit a78986aae9b2988f8493f9f65a587ee433e83bc3 ]
>
> Explicitly exempt ZONE_DEVICE pages from kvm_is_reserved_pfn() and
> instead manually handle ZONE_DEVICE on a case-by-case basis. For things
> like page refcounts, KVM needs to treat ZONE_DEVICE pages like normal
> pages, e.g. put pages grabbed via gup(). But for flows such as setting
> A/D bits or shifting refcounts for transparent huge pages, KVM needs to
> to avoid processing ZONE_DEVICE pages as the flows in question lack the
> underlying machinery for proper handling of ZONE_DEVICE pages.
>
> This fixes a hang reported by Adam Borowski[*] in dev_pagemap_cleanup()
> when running a KVM guest backed with /dev/dax memory, as KVM straight up
> doesn't put any references to ZONE_DEVICE pages acquired by gup().
>
> Note, Dan Williams proposed an alternative solution of doing put_page()
> on ZONE_DEVICE pages immediately after gup() in order to simplify the
> auditing needed to ensure is_zone_device_page() is called if and only if
> the backing device is pinned (via gup()). But that approach would break
> kvm_vcpu_{un}map() as KVM requires the page to be pinned from map() 'til
> unmap() when accessing guest memory, unlike KVM's secondary MMU, which
> coordinates with mmu_notifier invalidations to avoid creating stale
> page references, i.e. doesn't rely on pages being pinned.
>
> [*] http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190919115547.GA17963@angband.pl
>
> Reported-by: Adam Borowski <kilobyte@angband.pl>
> Analyzed-by: David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>
> Acked-by: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org
> Fixes: 3565fce3a659 ("mm, x86: get_user_pages() for dax mappings")
> Signed-off-by: Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
> [sean: backport to 4.x; resolve conflict in mmu.c]
All 3 now queued up, thanks.
greg k-h
prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-26 8:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-25 19:04 Sean Christopherson
2019-11-26 8:14 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191126081450.GB1233188@kroah.com \
--to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
--cc=dan.j.williams@intel.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
--cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®