From: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
To: xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>,
Boris Ostrovsky <boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com>,
Stefano Stabellini <sstabellini@kernel.org>
Subject: [PATCH v3] xen/events: remove event handling recursion detection
Date: Fri, 29 Nov 2019 13:39:41 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191129123941.11975-1-jgross@suse.com> (raw)
__xen_evtchn_do_upcall() contains guards against being called
recursively. This mechanism was introduced in the early pvops times
(kernel 2.6.26) when there were all the Xen backend drivers missing
from the upstream kernel, and some of those out-of-tree drivers were
enabling interrupts in their event handlers (which was explicitly
allowed in the initial XenoLinux).
Nowadays we don't need to support those old drivers any more and the
capability to allow recursive calls of __xen_evtchn_do_upcall() can
be removed.
Signed-off-by: Juergen Gross <jgross@suse.com>
---
V2: adapt commit message (Jan Beulich)
V3: rmb() -> virt_rmb() (Boris Ostrovsky)
---
drivers/xen/events/events_base.c | 16 +++-------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
index 6c8843968a52..499eff7d3f65 100644
--- a/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
+++ b/drivers/xen/events/events_base.c
@@ -1213,31 +1213,21 @@ void xen_send_IPI_one(unsigned int cpu, enum ipi_vector vector)
notify_remote_via_irq(irq);
}
-static DEFINE_PER_CPU(unsigned, xed_nesting_count);
-
static void __xen_evtchn_do_upcall(void)
{
struct vcpu_info *vcpu_info = __this_cpu_read(xen_vcpu);
- int cpu = get_cpu();
- unsigned count;
+ int cpu = smp_processor_id();
do {
vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending = 0;
- if (__this_cpu_inc_return(xed_nesting_count) - 1)
- goto out;
-
xen_evtchn_handle_events(cpu);
BUG_ON(!irqs_disabled());
- count = __this_cpu_read(xed_nesting_count);
- __this_cpu_write(xed_nesting_count, 0);
- } while (count != 1 || vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending);
-
-out:
+ virt_rmb(); /* Hypervisor can set upcall pending. */
- put_cpu();
+ } while (vcpu_info->evtchn_upcall_pending);
}
void xen_evtchn_do_upcall(struct pt_regs *regs)
--
2.16.4
next reply other threads:[~2019-11-29 12:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-29 12:39 Juergen Gross [this message]
2019-11-30 1:11 ` Boris Ostrovsky
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191129123941.11975-1-jgross@suse.com \
--to=jgross@suse.com \
--cc=boris.ostrovsky@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sstabellini@kernel.org \
--cc=xen-devel@lists.xenproject.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®