From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 90401C43603 for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 582932173E for ; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:57:05 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576076225; bh=RikKpQKAfx88f9r5aeSm+aYV6wJVq+oyRXyFAH4If2w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:List-ID:From; b=W5lA9OPsq2hfNKoJ1vGziYRncJ3EjSl6s7Po+M/ySHJdFYpDlvItMFpNtdg70LegA Mt82T14ti6/NO2wxGCnVpi7oQkYfb/Z4CwERl5p+WyU0rEFE4CyWCH9yzGAubG2lnn xIemz6Gq2fDub1DrOfQ60LXUclLxrnV2h4Q9wk04= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1729370AbfLKO5E (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:57:04 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:48182 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727851AbfLKO5E (ORCPT ); Wed, 11 Dec 2019 09:57:04 -0500 Received: from localhost (83-86-89-107.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl [83.86.89.107]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2B5CE214AF; Wed, 11 Dec 2019 14:57:03 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1576076223; bh=RikKpQKAfx88f9r5aeSm+aYV6wJVq+oyRXyFAH4If2w=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Vwq5ih3Gzc/zeRWqiDWqjjHHUk8T8yWngddwLrn88d+62gc8BLDalBM9Ro3btuvg+ 4BlVNYcEkH/h9G+Z+kqn518qD7kwkTzAfT4s5AjMI64aryGCp1raMfMnM5z3HaFaPw oCPkkDQBRXk2gqtcBzJsa9xdEbKWlY12MHqmHlig= Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 15:57:00 +0100 From: Greg KH To: Thomas Renninger Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Felix Schnizlein , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Felix Schnizlein , linux-arch@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org, linux@armlinux.org.uk, will.deacon@arm.com, x86@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/3] x86 cpuinfo: implement sysfs nodes for x86 Message-ID: <20191211145700.GA639677@kroah.com> References: <20191206162421.15050-1-trenn@suse.de> <22533595.7ohjOCJ8As@skinner.arch.suse.de> <20191211142647.GB605616@kroah.com> <2139491.Komy7AgBfX@skinner.arch.suse.de> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <2139491.Komy7AgBfX@skinner.arch.suse.de> Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:52:33PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > On Wednesday, December 11, 2019 3:26:47 PM CET Greg KH wrote: > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:12:51PM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > > On Wednesday, December 11, 2019 2:56:19 PM CET Greg KH wrote: > > > > On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 11:42:35AM +0100, Thomas Renninger wrote: > > ... > > > > I hope it is agreed that this info is worth exporting via sysfs. > > > > I don't think anyone is saying it is worth exporting this information > > via sysfs at all here. > > Ok. I go for cpuid userspace tool then. > > I'd still say general files like: > cpu/info/{name,vendor} > make sense, so that if exported by an arch like in cpuinfo, it should show up > in the same file. > Every cpu has a model name and a vendor and cpuid is x86 only. I think you just saw the ARM developers arguing about model names, so I don't think people will agree with that :) goo dluck! greg k-h