From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: Alexey Budankov <alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Casey Schaufler <casey@schaufler-ca.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@kernel.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>, Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>,
elena.reshetova@intel.com,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com>,
Jann Horn <jannh@google.com>, Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@google.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org>,
linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org, selinux@vger.kernel.org,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/3] Introduce CAP_SYS_PERFMON capability for secure Perf users groups
Date: Wed, 11 Dec 2019 16:24:35 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20191211152435.GN2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ab206ef5-466e-7bce-3e5f-53da110bddb2@linux.intel.com>
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 01:52:15PM +0300, Alexey Budankov wrote:
> Undoubtedly, SELinux is the powerful, mature, whole level of functionality that
> could provide benefits not only for perf_events subsystem. However perf_events
> is built around capabilities to provide access control to its functionality,
> thus perf_events would require considerable rework prior it could be controlled
> thru SELinux.
You mean this:
da97e18458fb ("perf_event: Add support for LSM and SELinux checks")
?
> Then the adoption could also require changes to the installed
> infrastructure just for the sake of adopting alternative access control mechanism.
This is still very much true.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-12-11 15:24 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-12-05 16:15 Alexey Budankov
2019-12-05 16:19 ` [PATCH v1 1/3] capabilities: introduce CAP_SYS_PERFMON to kernel and user space Alexey Budankov
2019-12-05 16:21 ` [PATCH v1 2/3] perf/core: apply CAP_SYS_PERFMON to CPUs and kernel monitoring Alexey Budankov
2019-12-05 16:22 ` [PATCH v1 3/3] perf tool: extend Perf tool with CAP_SYS_PERFMON support Alexey Budankov
2019-12-05 16:49 ` [PATCH v1 0/3] Introduce CAP_SYS_PERFMON capability for secure Perf users groups Casey Schaufler
2019-12-05 17:05 ` Alexey Budankov
2019-12-05 17:33 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-12-05 18:11 ` Andi Kleen
2019-12-05 18:37 ` Alexey Budankov
2019-12-11 10:52 ` Alexey Budankov
2019-12-11 15:24 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2019-12-11 17:00 ` Alexey Budankov
2019-12-11 18:09 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-12-11 20:36 ` Andi Kleen
2019-12-11 21:25 ` Casey Schaufler
2019-12-12 14:24 ` Stephen Smalley
2019-12-15 11:53 ` Alexey Budankov
2019-12-11 19:04 ` Stephane Eranian
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20191211152435.GN2827@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=acme@kernel.org \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com \
--cc=alexey.budankov@linux.intel.com \
--cc=casey@schaufler-ca.com \
--cc=elena.reshetova@intel.com \
--cc=eranian@google.com \
--cc=jannh@google.com \
--cc=jolsa@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-security-module@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=namhyung@kernel.org \
--cc=selinux@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®