From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 42F4FC33CA3 for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 17:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 23F4F2084D for ; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 17:17:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1728065AbgAJRRO (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:17:14 -0500 Received: from ms.lwn.net ([45.79.88.28]:52042 "EHLO ms.lwn.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727767AbgAJRRJ (ORCPT ); Fri, 10 Jan 2020 12:17:09 -0500 Received: from lwn.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ms.lwn.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 2D85077D; Fri, 10 Jan 2020 17:17:08 +0000 (UTC) Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 10:17:07 -0700 From: Jonathan Corbet To: Palmer Dabbelt Cc: Atish Patra , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-riscv@lists.infradead.org, merker@debian.org, Paul Walmsley , aou@eecs.berkeley.edu, linux-doc@vger.kernel.org, palmer@sifive.com, mchehab+samsung@kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] RISC-V: Typo fixes in image header and documentation. Message-ID: <20200110101707.06800f3c@lwn.net> In-Reply-To: References: <20191210072947.7018340c@lwn.net> <4912c007ab6c19321c8c988ae2328efbfb3e582d.camel@wdc.com> Organization: LWN.net MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, 09 Jan 2020 15:42:27 -0800 (PST) Palmer Dabbelt wrote: > > I was assuming it was going through the risc-v tree since it touches arch > > code :) I can go ahead and apply it. > > I don't see this in 5.5-rc5. It's in docs-next; I've not pushed it through straight to 5.5. I can do that, I suppose, if it seems urgent? Thanks, jon