From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@redhat.com>
To: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@alien8.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@zytor.com>,
x86@kernel.org, Tony Luck <tony.luck@intel.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
Neelima Krishnan <neelima.krishnan@intel.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>,
Andi Kleen <ak@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/cpu: Update cached HLE state on write to TSX_CTRL_CPUID_CLEAR
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:15:13 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200115211513.mxzembrm4hf44d6j@treble> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <2529b99546294c893dfa1c89e2b3e46da3369a59.1578685425.git.pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 02:50:54PM -0800, Pawan Gupta wrote:
> /proc/cpuinfo currently reports Hardware Lock Elision (HLE) feature to
> be present on boot cpu even if it was disabled during the bootup. This
> is because cpuinfo_x86->x86_capability HLE bit is not updated after TSX
> state is changed via a new MSR IA32_TSX_CTRL.
>
> Update the cached HLE bit also since it is expected to change after an
> update to CPUID_CLEAR bit in MSR IA32_TSX_CTRL.
>
> Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta <pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com>
> Tested-by: Neelima Krishnan <neelima.krishnan@intel.com>
> Reviewed-by: Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@linux.intel.com>
From the Intel TAA deep dive page [1], it says:
"On processors that enumerate IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES[TSX_CTRL] (bit
7)=1, HLE prefix hints are always ignored."
So if the CPU has IA32_TSX_CTRL, HLE is implicitly disabled, so why
would the HLE bit have been set in CPUID in the first place?
[1] https://software.intel.com/security-software-guidance/insights/deep-dive-intel-transactional-synchronization-extensions-intel-tsx-asynchronous-abort
--
Josh
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-01-15 21:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-10 22:50 Pawan Gupta
2020-01-15 21:15 ` Josh Poimboeuf [this message]
2020-01-15 21:49 ` Luck, Tony
2020-01-15 21:52 ` Andi Kleen
2020-01-16 14:38 ` Josh Poimboeuf
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200115211513.mxzembrm4hf44d6j@treble \
--to=jpoimboe@redhat.com \
--cc=ak@linux.intel.com \
--cc=bp@alien8.de \
--cc=dave.hansen@linux.intel.com \
--cc=hpa@zytor.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mhocko@suse.com \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=neelima.krishnan@intel.com \
--cc=pawan.kumar.gupta@linux.intel.com \
--cc=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=tony.luck@intel.com \
--cc=x86@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®