From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6F93DC33CAF for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:16:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 440812082F for ; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:16:24 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1579230984; bh=Pv2hU0kC+NNhp2G0ieTjOr4w9ey+PNyLJxlmNWkf/j4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=jMwBuAfmc22BMj7x2z/UJQ/6KE7o/OE7iipELKtXArrfZtPtIrht72BJcunW2u5po xG9n3QWH5jNxH/UA0zR9WFEsRsWp86lxcufPKUKTsOJ6v0Etcb4WcMPubO+CnTdwyB AJPMUm45Cm/1qIxDiun0dzo5TF93W9iGNAUQURwI= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S2389351AbgAQDQK (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:16:10 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:52122 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727015AbgAQDQK (ORCPT ); Thu, 16 Jan 2020 22:16:10 -0500 Received: from X1 (nat-ab2241.sltdut.senawave.net [162.218.216.4]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id BE85220679; Fri, 17 Jan 2020 03:16:09 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1579230969; bh=Pv2hU0kC+NNhp2G0ieTjOr4w9ey+PNyLJxlmNWkf/j4=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=PxYqemw+WtaVcgnGoE30v238L3q61frkBF7mDd9rfw2Li3dIWg6z/0I805u3XKDLz AZMCUCujV11mMjaPdcQLcHrgZhDfI88Bod1Avr6KwaH3JOY68+8ZqpfUgw0gUZfTDp NjsAvGFq3rCcT3rIqmOZcdhFIPzT78HTOTXokPPA= Date: Thu, 16 Jan 2020 19:16:09 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: David Rientjes Cc: Mel Gorman , Vlastimil Babka , linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-mm@kvack.org Subject: Re: [patch] mm, thp: fix defrag setting if newline is not used Message-Id: <20200116191609.3972fd5301cf364a27381923@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.32; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:58:36 -0800 (PST) David Rientjes wrote: > If thp defrag setting "defer" is used and a newline is *not* used when > writing to the sysfs file, this is interpreted as the "defer+madvise" > option. > > This is because we do prefix matching and if five characters are written > without a newline, the current code ends up comparing to the first five > bytes of the "defer+madvise" option and using that instead. > > Find the length of what the user is writing and use that to guide our > decision on which string comparison to do. Gee, why is this code so complicated? Can't we just do if (sysfs_streq(buf, "always")) { ... } else if sysfs_streq(buf, "defer+madvise")) { ... } ...