From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B995CC33CB3 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:42:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8C57C21739 for ; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:42:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580262173; bh=Dm5O1JcZZZn4Fmmh8ZEVuwwpAngNiF+PCJfRS/Xf9zw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:List-ID:From; b=UtT6AN9rjsTTRfS2fk2tLV/Gy7E4AKYS+vQjPCOQE/hoBq2mCIVaXif9BWTacfEIu tIEYLgrC4T5dscGncocgqdJH1/Rl9+dVinzrYDWEaKp7Yr3WXHGn6nqpGUTNZcqiMq PLqy1Z92qdl3cmcr73ywzalCDQWTSh+kA3YRae+Q= Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726485AbgA2Bmw (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jan 2020 20:42:52 -0500 Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.29.99]:49034 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726333AbgA2Bmw (ORCPT ); Tue, 28 Jan 2020 20:42:52 -0500 Received: from localhost.localdomain (c-73-231-172-41.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.231.172.41]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 1914B2051A; Wed, 29 Jan 2020 01:42:51 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=default; t=1580262171; bh=Dm5O1JcZZZn4Fmmh8ZEVuwwpAngNiF+PCJfRS/Xf9zw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=IuNPIsR0oGrUykv480vwdj6CsOazTln5Bw1n/BEKw1a/AsxXikVYbWTsDoZHVn1NH t/EI5lRCJXpmAa1YAwlsAfg3SXA/vfAdzvcPXlErBoR7v2HI9/sbLaWbGUKdyFKt2C ZB09jVEnfNltBzwVSCZDK1MGtariwNUd7/U93c4E= Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2020 17:42:48 -0800 From: Andrew Morton To: Doug Anderson Cc: Paul Burton , Jason Wessel , Daniel Thompson , qiaochong , kgdb-bugreport@lists.sourceforge.net, Ralf Baechle , Mike Rapoport , Chuhong Yuan , linux-mips , Nicholas Mc Guire , James Hogan , "Gustavo A. R. Silva" , Serge Semin , Prarit Bhargava , Will Deacon , Sebastian Andrzej Siewior , Christophe Leroy , Philippe =?ISO-8859-1?Q?Mathieu-Daud=E9?= , "Eric W. Biederman" , LKML , Dan Carpenter Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] kdb: Don't implicitly change tasks; plus misc fixups Message-Id: <20200128174248.756f18d713e759be2b4273db@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20191109191644.191766-1-dianders@chromium.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.5.1 (GTK+ 2.24.31; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Tue, 28 Jan 2020 08:59:01 -0800 Doug Anderson wrote: > Hi > > On Sat, Nov 9, 2019 at 11:17 AM Douglas Anderson wrote: > > > > This started out as just a follow-up to Daniel's post [1]. I wanted > > to stop implicitly changing the current task in kdb. ...but, of > > course, everywhere you look in kdb there are things to cleanup, so > > this gets a few misc cleanups I found along the way. Enjoy. > > > > [1] https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191010150735.dhrj3pbjgmjrdpwr@holly.lan > > > > > > Douglas Anderson (5): > > MIPS: kdb: Remove old workaround for backtracing on other CPUs > > kdb: kdb_current_regs should be private > > kdb: kdb_current_task shouldn't be exported > > kdb: Gid rid of implicit setting of the current task / regs > > kdb: Get rid of confusing diag msg from "rd" if current task has no > > regs > > > > arch/mips/kernel/traps.c | 5 ----- > > include/linux/kdb.h | 2 -- > > kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_bt.c | 8 +------- > > kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_main.c | 31 ++++++++++++++----------------- > > kernel/debug/kdb/kdb_private.h | 2 +- > > 5 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 32 deletions(-) > > I noticed that this series doesn't seem to be in linux-next, but I > think it was supposed to target v5.6? Do you know if there is > anything outstanding or if it'll be queued up sometime soon? > I grabbed them. Are there any updates on the testing status, particularly on MIPS?