From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CAF7C33C9E for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 11:36:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E36F12083E for ; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 11:36:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=alien8.de header.i=@alien8.de header.b="owaJOXae" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727223AbgA3Lg2 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 06:36:28 -0500 Received: from mail.skyhub.de ([5.9.137.197]:59164 "EHLO mail.skyhub.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726980AbgA3Lg1 (ORCPT ); Thu, 30 Jan 2020 06:36:27 -0500 Received: from zn.tnic (p200300EC2F0A2D00708CE17CE0236808.dip0.t-ipconnect.de [IPv6:2003:ec:2f0a:2d00:708c:e17c:e023:6808]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.skyhub.de (SuperMail on ZX Spectrum 128k) with ESMTPSA id 00E651EC0C35; Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:36:25 +0100 (CET) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=alien8.de; s=dkim; t=1580384186; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:in-reply-to:in-reply-to: references:references; bh=H36ykz5naWIQ4dY4VToh2KOl152TyIJxqOH958o/k04=; b=owaJOXaekQ8qGc/B0p3nmoF+8Z1/C5hlv6ncPiuv9/fqRzrwFwGMUhe2EuQyqfRA9Idw99 ta/IEBW70DJaiyz9zcN51MR/Qdm8u+s1A0eyZ9ZIOjvYa2PCF+uqscw5Rmm+NgVi9Rp0Xw b/ji/EuCxZDvdhwwMSqwTHPV5OH/Yes= Date: Thu, 30 Jan 2020 12:36:19 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Sergey Senozhatsky Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Peter Anvin , x86@kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/boot: fix kaslr-enabled build Message-ID: <20200130113619.GE6656@zn.tnic> References: <20200129162926.1006-1-sergey.senozhatsky@gmail.com> <20200130110008.GD6656@zn.tnic> <20200130113134.GA498@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20200130113134.GA498@jagdpanzerIV.localdomain> User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Thu, Jan 30, 2020 at 08:31:34PM +0900, Sergey Senozhatsky wrote: > Oh, didn't occur to me that this can be compiler specific. > But yes, apparently it is. gcc-9.2 is fine, but not gcc-10 > release-candidate. Ah ok, that makes more sense. That's being discussed ATM but it is merge window so it'll take a while: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20200124181811.4780-1-hjl.tools@gmail.com -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette