From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
To: "Kammela, Gayatri" <gayatri.kammela@intel.com>
Cc: Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Somayaji, Vishwanath" <vishwanath.somayaji@intel.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>,
"Westerberg, Mika" <mika.westerberg@intel.com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
"Prestopine, Charles D" <charles.d.prestopine@intel.com>,
"Pandruvada, Srinivas" <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>,
"Box, David E" <david.e.box@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs entries
Date: Tue, 4 Feb 2020 13:34:14 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200204113414.GB10400@smile.fi.intel.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <BL0PR11MB3107F8D50FCADD168EAA9E7BF2030@BL0PR11MB3107.namprd11.prod.outlook.com>
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 04:00:43AM +0000, Kammela, Gayatri wrote:
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@gmail.com>
> > Sent: Monday, January 27, 2020 11:00 AM
> > To: Kammela, Gayatri <gayatri.kammela@intel.com>
> > Cc: Platform Driver <platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org>; Linux Kernel
> > Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>; Somayaji, Vishwanath
> > <vishwanath.somayaji@intel.com>; Darren Hart <dvhart@infradead.org>;
> > Westerberg, Mika <mika.westerberg@intel.com>; Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
> > <peterz@infradead.org>; Prestopine, Charles D
> > <charles.d.prestopine@intel.com>; Pandruvada, Srinivas
> > <srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com>; Andy Shevchenko
> > <andriy.shevchenko@linux.intel.com>; Box, David E
> > <david.e.box@intel.com>
> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 0/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs
> > entries
> >
> > On Mon, Jan 27, 2020 at 8:03 PM Kammela, Gayatri
> > <gayatri.kammela@intel.com> wrote:
> >
> > > > It doesn't apply to our for-next branch.
> > > Sorry to hear that. I've rebased the series on mainline 5.5-rc7. Should I
> > rebase it on for-next branch?
> >
> > You should always base your branch on the for-next (whatever it's being
> > called) of the subsystem your series against of.
>
> Hi Andy,
>
> The current series has a dependency on Tiger Lake and Elkhart Lake patche which is merged in to mainline.
>
> (554f269f0f38 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Intel Elkhart Lake support
> 49a437941c3f platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add Intel Tiger Lake support
> 6268c0b278b5 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Make debugfs entry for pch_ip_power_gating_status conditional
> e39854781830 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Create platform dependent bitmap structs
> b1cb33dae414 platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Clean up: Remove comma after the termination line)
>
> But they are not available in for-next branch. I am confused, how that could be the case. For me to base the current series on for-next branch, the dependency patch series should be available in for-next branch.
I'm wondering how did you check it?
The branch location is in this [1] tree.
[1]: http://git.infradead.org/linux-platform-drivers-x86.git
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-04 11:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-01-24 18:50 Gayatri Kammela
2020-01-24 18:50 ` [PATCH v1 1/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs entry to access sub-state residencies Gayatri Kammela
2020-01-24 18:50 ` [PATCH v1 2/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs entry for low power mode status registers Gayatri Kammela
2020-01-24 18:50 ` [PATCH v1 3/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Refactor the driver by removing redundant code Gayatri Kammela
2020-01-24 18:50 ` [PATCH v1 4/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Remove slp_s0 attributes from tgl_reg_map Gayatri Kammela
2020-01-24 18:50 ` [PATCH v1 5/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add an additional parameter to pmc_core_lpm_display() Gayatri Kammela
2020-01-24 18:50 ` [PATCH v1 6/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Dump low power status registers on an S0ix.y failure Gayatri Kammela
2020-01-24 18:50 ` [PATCH v1 7/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs support to access live status registers Gayatri Kammela
2020-01-27 10:49 ` [PATCH v1 0/7] platform/x86: intel_pmc_core: Add debugfs entries Andy Shevchenko
2020-01-27 18:02 ` Kammela, Gayatri
2020-01-27 18:59 ` Andy Shevchenko
2020-02-04 4:00 ` Kammela, Gayatri
2020-02-04 11:34 ` Andy Shevchenko [this message]
2020-02-04 23:10 ` Kammela, Gayatri
2020-02-05 9:08 ` Andy Shevchenko
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200204113414.GB10400@smile.fi.intel.com \
--to=andy.shevchenko@gmail.com \
--cc=charles.d.prestopine@intel.com \
--cc=david.e.box@intel.com \
--cc=dvhart@infradead.org \
--cc=gayatri.kammela@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mika.westerberg@intel.com \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=platform-driver-x86@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=srinivas.pandruvada@intel.com \
--cc=vishwanath.somayaji@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®