From: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@redhat.com>
To: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@intel.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@google.com>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Liran Alon <liran.alon@oracle.com>,
Roman Kagan <rkagan@virtuozzo.com>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: fix enlightened VMCS & QEMU4.2
Date: Wed, 5 Feb 2020 13:30:31 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200205123034.630229-1-vkuznets@redhat.com> (raw)
With fine grained VMX feature enablement QEMU>=4.2 tries to do KVM_SET_MSRS
with default (matching CPU model) values and in case eVMCS is also enabled,
fails. While the regression is in QEMU, it may still be preferable to
fix this in KVM.
It would be great if we could just omit the VMX feature filtering in KVM
and make this guest's responsibility: if it switches to using enlightened
vmcs it should be aware that not all hardware features are going to be
supported. Genuine Hyper-V, however, fails the test. It, for example,
enables SECONDARY_EXEC_VIRTUALIZE_APIC_ACCESSES and without
'apic_access_addr' field in eVMCS there's not much we can do in KVM.
Microsoft confirms the bug but it is unclear if it will ever get fixed
in the existing Hyper-V versions as genuine Hyper-V never exposes
these unsupported controls to L1.
Changes since 'RFC':
- Go with the bare minimum [Paolo]
KVM RFC:
https://lore.kernel.org/kvm/20200115171014.56405-1-vkuznets@redhat.com/
QEMU RFC@:
https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2020-01/msg00123.html
Vitaly Kuznetsov (3):
x86/kvm/hyper-v: remove stale evmcs_already_enabled check from
nested_enable_evmcs()
x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls sanitization out of
nested_enable_evmcs()
x86/kvm/hyper-v: don't allow to turn on unsupported VMX controls for
nested guests
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.c | 90 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/evmcs.h | 3 ++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/nested.c | 3 ++
arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 16 ++++++-
4 files changed, 99 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-)
--
2.24.1
next reply other threads:[~2020-02-05 12:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-05 12:30 Vitaly Kuznetsov [this message]
2020-02-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 1/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: remove stale evmcs_already_enabled check from nested_enable_evmcs() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 2/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: move VMX controls sanitization out of nested_enable_evmcs() Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-05 12:30 ` [PATCH 3/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: don't allow to turn on unsupported VMX controls for nested guests Vitaly Kuznetsov
2020-02-05 14:55 ` [PATCH 0/3] x86/kvm/hyper-v: fix enlightened VMCS & QEMU4.2 Paolo Bonzini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200205123034.630229-1-vkuznets@redhat.com \
--to=vkuznets@redhat.com \
--cc=jmattson@google.com \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=liran.alon@oracle.com \
--cc=pbonzini@redhat.com \
--cc=rkagan@virtuozzo.com \
--cc=sean.j.christopherson@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®