From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@stgolabs.net>
To: akpm@linux-foundation.org
Cc: dave@stgolabs.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
mcgrof@kernel.org, broonie@kernel.org,
alex.williamson@redhat.com, cohuck@redhat.com,
kvm@vger.kernel.org, Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 4/5] vfio/type1: optimize dma_list tree iterations
Date: Fri, 7 Feb 2020 10:03:04 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200207180305.11092-5-dave@stgolabs.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200207180305.11092-1-dave@stgolabs.net>
Both ->release() and ->attach_group() vfio_iommu driver
callbacks can incur in full in-order iommu->dma_list traversals,
which can be suboptimal under regular rbtree interators. This
patch proposes using the optimized llrbtree interface such that
we always have a branchless O(1) next node available. The cost
is higher memory footprint, mainly enlarging struct vfio_dma
by two pointers. This allows for minimal runtime overhead
when doing tree modifications.
Cc: alex.williamson@redhat.com
Cc: cohuck@redhat.com
Cc: kvm@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@suse.de>
---
drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c | 50 +++++++++++++++++++++++------------------
1 file changed, 28 insertions(+), 22 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
index 2ada8e6cdb88..875170fc8515 100644
--- a/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
+++ b/drivers/vfio/vfio_iommu_type1.c
@@ -28,6 +28,7 @@
#include <linux/module.h>
#include <linux/mm.h>
#include <linux/rbtree.h>
+#include <linux/ll_rbtree.h>
#include <linux/sched/signal.h>
#include <linux/sched/mm.h>
#include <linux/slab.h>
@@ -65,7 +66,7 @@ struct vfio_iommu {
struct list_head iova_list;
struct vfio_domain *external_domain; /* domain for external user */
struct mutex lock;
- struct rb_root dma_list;
+ struct llrb_root dma_list;
struct blocking_notifier_head notifier;
unsigned int dma_avail;
bool v2;
@@ -81,7 +82,7 @@ struct vfio_domain {
};
struct vfio_dma {
- struct rb_node node;
+ struct llrb_node node;
dma_addr_t iova; /* Device address */
unsigned long vaddr; /* Process virtual addr */
size_t size; /* Map size (bytes) */
@@ -134,10 +135,10 @@ static int put_pfn(unsigned long pfn, int prot);
static struct vfio_dma *vfio_find_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
dma_addr_t start, size_t size)
{
- struct rb_node *node = iommu->dma_list.rb_node;
+ struct rb_node *node = iommu->dma_list.rb_root.rb_node;
while (node) {
- struct vfio_dma *dma = rb_entry(node, struct vfio_dma, node);
+ struct vfio_dma *dma = llrb_entry(node, struct vfio_dma, node);
if (start + size <= dma->iova)
node = node->rb_left;
@@ -152,26 +153,30 @@ static struct vfio_dma *vfio_find_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
static void vfio_link_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *new)
{
- struct rb_node **link = &iommu->dma_list.rb_node, *parent = NULL;
+ struct rb_node **link = &iommu->dma_list.rb_root.rb_node;
+ struct rb_node *parent = NULL;
+ struct llrb_node *prev = NULL;
struct vfio_dma *dma;
while (*link) {
parent = *link;
- dma = rb_entry(parent, struct vfio_dma, node);
+ dma = llrb_entry(parent, struct vfio_dma, node);
if (new->iova + new->size <= dma->iova)
link = &(*link)->rb_left;
- else
+ else {
link = &(*link)->rb_right;
+ prev = llrb_from_rb(parent);
+ }
}
- rb_link_node(&new->node, parent, link);
- rb_insert_color(&new->node, &iommu->dma_list);
+ rb_link_node(&new->node.rb_node, parent, link);
+ llrb_insert(&iommu->dma_list, &new->node, prev);
}
static void vfio_unlink_dma(struct vfio_iommu *iommu, struct vfio_dma *old)
{
- rb_erase(&old->node, &iommu->dma_list);
+ llrb_erase(&old->node, &iommu->dma_list);
}
/*
@@ -1170,15 +1175,15 @@ static int vfio_iommu_replay(struct vfio_iommu *iommu,
struct vfio_domain *domain)
{
struct vfio_domain *d;
- struct rb_node *n;
+ struct llrb_node *n;
unsigned long limit = rlimit(RLIMIT_MEMLOCK) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
int ret;
/* Arbitrarily pick the first domain in the list for lookups */
d = list_first_entry(&iommu->domain_list, struct vfio_domain, next);
- n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
+ n = llrb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
- for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
+ for (; n; n = llrb_next(n)) {
struct vfio_dma *dma;
dma_addr_t iova;
@@ -1835,18 +1840,19 @@ static int vfio_iommu_type1_attach_group(void *iommu_data,
static void vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_all(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
{
- struct rb_node *node;
+ struct llrb_node *node;
- while ((node = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list)))
+ while ((node = llrb_first(&iommu->dma_list)))
vfio_remove_dma(iommu, rb_entry(node, struct vfio_dma, node));
}
static void vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_reaccount(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
{
- struct rb_node *n, *p;
+ struct llrb_node *n;
+ struct rb_node *p;
- n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
- for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
+ n = llrb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
+ for (; n; n = llrb_next(n)) {
struct vfio_dma *dma;
long locked = 0, unlocked = 0;
@@ -1866,10 +1872,10 @@ static void vfio_iommu_unmap_unpin_reaccount(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
static void vfio_sanity_check_pfn_list(struct vfio_iommu *iommu)
{
- struct rb_node *n;
+ struct llrb_node *n;
- n = rb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
- for (; n; n = rb_next(n)) {
+ n = llrb_first(&iommu->dma_list);
+ for (; n; n = llrb_next(n)) {
struct vfio_dma *dma;
dma = rb_entry(n, struct vfio_dma, node);
@@ -2060,7 +2066,7 @@ static void *vfio_iommu_type1_open(unsigned long arg)
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iommu->domain_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&iommu->iova_list);
- iommu->dma_list = RB_ROOT;
+ iommu->dma_list = LLRB_ROOT;
iommu->dma_avail = dma_entry_limit;
mutex_init(&iommu->lock);
BLOCKING_INIT_NOTIFIER_HEAD(&iommu->notifier);
--
2.16.4
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-07 18:14 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-07 18:03 [PATCH -next 0/5] rbtree: optimize frequent tree walks Davidlohr Bueso
2020-02-07 18:03 ` [PATCH 1/5] lib/rbtree: introduce linked-list rbtree interface Davidlohr Bueso
2020-02-10 20:07 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-02-10 21:28 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2020-02-10 21:44 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-02-07 18:03 ` [PATCH 2/5] proc/sysctl: optimize proc_sys_readdir Davidlohr Bueso
2020-02-10 20:08 ` Luis Chamberlain
2020-02-07 18:03 ` [PATCH 3/5] regmap: optimize sync() and drop() regcache callbacks Davidlohr Bueso
2020-02-10 13:11 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-07 18:03 ` Davidlohr Bueso [this message]
2020-02-07 18:03 ` [PATCH 5/5] uprobes: optimize build_probe_list() Davidlohr Bueso
2020-02-10 1:46 ` [PATCH -next 0/5] rbtree: optimize frequent tree walks Andrew Morton
2020-02-10 15:56 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2020-02-10 22:35 ` Andrew Morton
2020-02-13 15:50 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2020-02-11 11:20 ` Mark Brown
2020-02-13 15:55 ` Davidlohr Bueso
2020-02-13 16:56 ` Mark Brown
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200207180305.11092-5-dave@stgolabs.net \
--to=dave@stgolabs.net \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=cohuck@redhat.com \
--cc=dbueso@suse.de \
--cc=kvm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®