From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.3 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C4B1AC352A3 for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 08:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9628B2070A for ; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 08:48:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727804AbgBKIsK (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:48:10 -0500 Received: from mx2.suse.de ([195.135.220.15]:47578 "EHLO mx2.suse.de" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727566AbgBKIsK (ORCPT ); Tue, 11 Feb 2020 03:48:10 -0500 X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new at test-mx.suse.de Received: from relay2.suse.de (unknown [195.135.220.254]) by mx2.suse.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62C06B2F6; Tue, 11 Feb 2020 08:48:09 +0000 (UTC) Date: Tue, 11 Feb 2020 09:47:57 +0100 From: Borislav Petkov To: Linus Torvalds Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , the arch/x86 maintainers , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Julien Thierry , Peter Zijlstra Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/3] objtool: Add relocation check for alternative sections Message-ID: <20200211084757.GA31812@zn.tnic> References: <7b90b68d093311e4e8f6b504a9e1c758fd7e0002.1581359535.git.jpoimboe@redhat.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: User-Agent: Mutt/1.10.1 (2018-07-13) Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 05:51:44PM -0800, Linus Torvalds wrote: > On Mon, Feb 10, 2020 at 10:33 AM Josh Poimboeuf wrote: > LGTM. Did this actually find anything? And if not, did you verify that > it would by intentionally creating a bad alternative (perhaps the > broken one from my patch?) Yeah, we used your patch while playing with this. Lemme do some builds with this and see what fires. Nothing should, I would strongly assume. -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH, GF: Felix Imendörffer, HRB 36809, AG Nürnberg