mirror of https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>
To: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@gmail.com>,
	"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
	Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] workqueue: Document (some) memory-ordering properties of {queue,schedule}_work()
Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2020 16:00:53 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200212210053.GA80993@mtj.thefacebook.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200122183952.30083-1-parri.andrea@gmail.com>

On Wed, Jan 22, 2020 at 07:39:52PM +0100, Andrea Parri wrote:
> It's desirable to be able to rely on the following property:  All stores
> preceding (in program order) a call to a successful queue_work() will be
> visible from the CPU which will execute the queued work by the time such
> work executes, e.g.,
> 
>   { x is initially 0 }
> 
>     CPU0                              CPU1
> 
>     WRITE_ONCE(x, 1);                 [ "work" is being executed ]
>     r0 = queue_work(wq, work);          r1 = READ_ONCE(x);
> 
>   Forbids: r0 == true && r1 == 0
> 
> The current implementation of queue_work() provides such memory-ordering
> property:
> 
>   - In __queue_work(), the ->lock spinlock is acquired.
> 
>   - On the other side, in worker_thread(), this same ->lock is held
>     when dequeueing work.
> 
> So the locking ordering makes things work out.
> 
> Add this property to the DocBook headers of {queue,schedule}_work().
> 
> Suggested-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>
> Signed-off-by: Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@gmail.com>
> Acked-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@kernel.org>

Applied to wq/for-5.7.

Thanks.

-- 
tejun

      reply	other threads:[~2020-02-12 21:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-01-22 18:39 Andrea Parri
2020-02-12 21:00 ` Tejun Heo [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20200212210053.GA80993@mtj.thefacebook.com \
    --to=tj@kernel.org \
    --cc=jiangshanlai@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=parri.andrea@gmail.com \
    --cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
    --cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox

Powered by JetHome