From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Joel Savitz <jsavitz@redhat.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Rafael Aquini <aquini@redhat.com>,
linux-mm@kvack.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/page_alloc: increase default min_free_kbytes bound
Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2020 16:40:33 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200220164033.8634c2c836c1558daebd81b9@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200220150103.5183-1-jsavitz@redhat.com>
On Thu, 20 Feb 2020 10:01:03 -0500 Joel Savitz <jsavitz@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Currently, the vm.min_free_kbytes sysctl value is capped at a hardcoded
> 64M in init_per_zone_wmark_min (unless it is overridden by khugepaged
> initialization).
>
> This value has not been modified since 2005, and enterprise-grade
> systems now frequently have hundreds of GB of RAM and multiple 10, 40,
> or even 100 GB NICs. We have seen page allocation failures on heavily
> loaded systems related to NIC drivers. These issues were resolved by an
> increase to vm.min_free_kbytes.
>
> This patch increases the hardcoded value by a factor of 4 as a temporary
> solution.
OK, better than nothing I guess.
> Further work to make the calculation of vm.min_free_kbytes more
> consistent throughout the kernel would be desirable.
>
> As an example of the inconsistency of the current method, this value is
> recalculated by init_per_zone_wmark_min() in the case of memory hotplug
> which will override the value set by set_recommended_min_free_kbytes()
> called during khugepaged initialization even if khugepaged remains
> enabled, however an on/off toggle of khugepaged will then recalculate
> and set the value via set_recommended_min_free_kbytes().
>
Yup, these hardcoded numbers are lame.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-21 0:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-20 15:01 Joel Savitz
2020-02-21 0:40 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2020-02-21 1:27 ` Mike Kravetz
2020-02-21 1:53 ` John Hubbard
2020-02-27 12:45 ` Vlastimil Babka
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200220164033.8634c2c836c1558daebd81b9@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=aquini@redhat.com \
--cc=jsavitz@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mm@kvack.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
Powered by JetHome