From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
To: 王贇 <yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com>
Cc: Mel Gorman <mgorman@suse.de>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@redhat.com>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@redhat.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@linaro.org>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@arm.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@google.com>,
Luis Chamberlain <mcgrof@kernel.org>,
Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>,
Iurii Zaikin <yzaikin@google.com>,
Michal Koutn? <mkoutny@suse.com>,
linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-doc@vger.kernel.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@linux.ibm.com>,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RESEND v8 1/2] sched/numa: introduce per-cgroup NUMA locality info
Date: Fri, 21 Feb 2020 16:28:24 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20200221152824.GH18400@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <881deb50-163e-442a-41ec-b375cc445e4d@linux.alibaba.com>
On Mon, Feb 17, 2020 at 09:23:52PM +0800, 王贇 wrote:
> FYI, by monitoring locality, we found that the kvm vcpu thread is not
> covered by NUMA Balancing, whatever how many maximum period passed, the
> counters are not increasing, or very slowly, although inside guest we are
> copying memory.
>
> Later we found such task rarely exit to user space to trigger task
> work callbacks, and NUMA Balancing scan depends on that, which help us
> realize the importance to enable NUMA Balancing inside guest, with the
> correct NUMA topo, a big performance risk I'll say :-P
That's a bug in KVM, see:
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190801143657.785902257@linutronix.de
https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190801143657.887648487@linutronix.de
ISTR there being newer versions of that patch-set, but I can't seem to
find them in a hurry.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-02-21 15:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-02-07 3:34 [PATCH RESEND v8 0/2] sched/numa: introduce numa locality 王贇
2020-02-07 3:35 ` [PATCH RESEND v8 1/2] sched/numa: introduce per-cgroup NUMA locality info 王贇
2020-02-07 3:37 ` 王贇
2020-02-13 2:35 ` 王贇
2020-02-14 15:10 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-17 11:58 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-17 13:23 ` 王贇
2020-02-17 14:16 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-18 1:39 ` 王贇
2020-02-21 14:20 ` Mel Gorman
2020-02-21 15:47 ` Peter Zijlstra
2020-02-24 3:13 ` 王贇
2020-02-24 3:05 ` 王贇
2020-02-21 15:28 ` Peter Zijlstra [this message]
2020-02-24 3:09 ` 王贇
2020-02-07 3:35 ` [PATCH RESEND v8 2/2] sched/numa: documentation for per-cgroup numa 王贇
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20200221152824.GH18400@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net \
--to=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=bsegall@google.com \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=dietmar.eggemann@arm.com \
--cc=juri.lelli@redhat.com \
--cc=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=linux-doc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mcgrof@kernel.org \
--cc=mgorman@suse.de \
--cc=mingo@redhat.com \
--cc=mkoutny@suse.com \
--cc=paulmck@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=rostedt@goodmis.org \
--cc=vincent.guittot@linaro.org \
--cc=yun.wang@linux.alibaba.com \
--cc=yzaikin@google.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox
all inboxes | Powered by JetHome®